write an essay in about 200 words on the problem of periodisation in history
Answers
Hey.I hope it Helps.
Periodization in history has positive aspects to it as it sheds light on significant events of a particular time in history making it comparable to past and future events of the same nature. It also helps to understand the events in the sequence of their occurrence and their impact. But its drawback is that it is limited to the viewpoint of the historian who wrote it.
Different
historians have approached Indian history in different ways as they saw it.
James Mill, the Scottish philosopher and economist felt the need to divide
Indian history on the basis of religion, into three periods – Hindu, Muslim and
British. His viewpoints were very limited and biased. There were also other
faiths that were followed. And the notion that the British would take India
into progress and enlightenment from the previous dark ages of ignorance,
darkness, religious intolerance and such, was prejudiced and incorrect.
Other
historians have classified the Indian history as ancient, medieval and modern.
This viewpoint also had lot of wrong projections. The ancient and medieval
period were looked upon as dark ages without any scientific development or
knowledge. This is not true in reality.
It is true
that historical events need to be seen in the context of dates as they help in
correlating events. But events take a very long time to materialize so they
cannot be bound by dates alone for reference. Events need to be studied in the
context of other related events to get the right picture and to draw correct
conclusion.
Mark me brainliest.
Answer:
Periodization is the process or study of categorizing the past into individual, quantified, named blocks of time.[1] This is usually done to facilitate the study and analysis of history, the understanding of current and historical processes and causalities that may have connected these events.
The result is descriptive abstractions that provide convenient terms for time periods with relatively stable characteristics. However, determining the exact beginning and end of any "period" is often arbitrary, as it has changed throughout history.
To the_extent that history is_continuous and not_generalized, all systems of periodization are more or less arbitrary. Without named periods, however clumsy or imprecise, the past would be nothing more than scattered events with no framework to help us understand them. Nations, cultures, families, and even individuals, each with their own distinct remembered histories, are constantly engaged in the imposition of overlapping schemes of temporal periodization. Periodization labels are constantly being challenged and redefined, but once established, a period "label" is so comfortable that much is hard to change or shake.
It is true that historical events need to be seen in the context of data as they help in correlating events. But events take a very long time to materialize, so they can't just be data bound for reference. Events need to be studied in the context of other related events to get the right picture and draw the right conclusion.
#SPJ2