Political Science, asked by bzahid6268, 10 months ago

Write an essay on Post – behaviouralism

Answers

Answered by shubhita270793
1

Post-Behaviouralism accepted and advocated:

Post-Behaviouralism accepted and advocated:1. The need to study all realities of Politics.

Post-Behaviouralism accepted and advocated:1. The need to study all realities of Politics.2. The need to study social change.

3. The need to end the obsession with methods and techniques and the need to study the substance of politics.

3. The need to end the obsession with methods and techniques and the need to study the substance of politics.4. The need to admit the study of values along with facts.

3. The need to end the obsession with methods and techniques and the need to study the substance of politics.4. The need to admit the study of values along with facts.5. The need to help the society to develop by the use of knowledge of politics.

3. The need to end the obsession with methods and techniques and the need to study the substance of politics.4. The need to admit the study of values along with facts.5. The need to help the society to develop by the use of knowledge of politics.6. The need to put knowledge of politics into action by the political scientists.

7. The need to serve the society by helping it to preserve and develop its values.

7. The need to serve the society by helping it to preserve and develop its values.Post-Behaviouralists now advocated ‘Relevance’ and ‘Action’ as two guiding goals and accepted the need for the study of values in Politics.

7. The need to serve the society by helping it to preserve and develop its values.Post-Behaviouralists now advocated ‘Relevance’ and ‘Action’ as two guiding goals and accepted the need for the study of values in Politics.Relevance meant study of all the realities, brute realities of politics. Mere development of techniques and methods was not enough. Political Science must give primary importance to the study of the social realities and social change. It should not be conservative and static in approach and efforts.

7. The need to serve the society by helping it to preserve and develop its values.Post-Behaviouralists now advocated ‘Relevance’ and ‘Action’ as two guiding goals and accepted the need for the study of values in Politics.Relevance meant study of all the realities, brute realities of politics. Mere development of techniques and methods was not enough. Political Science must give primary importance to the study of the social realities and social change. It should not be conservative and static in approach and efforts.Action meant the responsibility of the political scientists to act in the political process. It stood for the use of knowledge and understanding of politics for helping the society to develop by adopting the valued reforms.

7. The need to serve the society by helping it to preserve and develop its values.Post-Behaviouralists now advocated ‘Relevance’ and ‘Action’ as two guiding goals and accepted the need for the study of values in Politics.Relevance meant study of all the realities, brute realities of politics. Mere development of techniques and methods was not enough. Political Science must give primary importance to the study of the social realities and social change. It should not be conservative and static in approach and efforts.Action meant the responsibility of the political scientists to act in the political process. It stood for the use of knowledge and understanding of politics for helping the society to develop by adopting the valued reforms.The Post-Behaviouralists accepted the responsibility of getting involved in the process of social change through social action. Total concentration on the development of techniques and methods for building a scientific theory of politics was held to be inadequate. It was to be supplemented by willing and purposive involvement in social action for social change.

Answered by yagneshravaliya2004
0

Answer:

Behavioralism, which was one of the dominant approaches in the 1950s and '60s, is the view that the subject matter of political science should be limited to phenomena that are independently observable and quantifiable. It assumes that political institutions largely reflect underlying social forces…

Similar questions