Write an essay on:
something u have that isn't expensive but means a lot to you
Answers
Answer:
value is a strange, illusory concept. how can a word be so universally understood and yet so difficult to define or even agree with? seriously, try to write out a satisfying definition of “value.” it’s not easy. when i was in my third year of university i was part of a group that built a museum exhibit that explored the concept of value. we called it “beyond the dollar” — our bias was clear, but the sentiment was legitimate.
in it we presented four subcategories of value: monetary value, instrumental value (i.e. the utility of something), individual or personal value, and value to a community (or city or country or continent, you get the idea). while the categories formed a useful classification system and a structure for exploring the concept of value, they fail(ed) to encapsulate the richness and complexity of what makes things valuable or not. or valuable to some and not to others. or valuable to one person and no one else.
the idea of something having “monetary value” is fairly well understood. goods and services cost money. generally, we all agree fairly closely on what different things are worth. occasionally we will be shocked or surprised at something’s assigned monetary value, but we can still understand how that value is expressed: money or credit is given in exchange for something, or something is retained by a person or group due to its financial potential.
what is lost in these dry, straightforward definitions is exactly what i find most interesting about the idea of value. for example, saying something has monetary value does nothing to help you understand the work that someone put in to get the money they used to purchase said thing. what kind of effort and love and frustration was poured from someone’s body to obtain the capital needed to make something as simple as a purchase?
or for instrumental value: what kind of time and effort was put in by the person using the object? for example, a fishing rod has instrumental value — it allows someone to catch fish. but saying it has the potential to catch fish and therefore has some level of utility does nothing to describe the dedication and commitment of the fisherperson wielding the rod. how many thousands of hours have they put into honing their craft, their passion?
to answer the question: there are plenty of items i own that aren’t worth any money but mean the world to me. i’ve got a box filled with letters from friends and family. each one of those is deeply precious to me. i have stacks of photographs — yes, physical photographs — that aren’t worth a dime but bring me such rich nostalgia and emotion. like most of you, i’ve got articles of clothing that i never wear but would never dream of discarding.
value is a quintessentially human concept. we assign such importance to objects, importance that transcends any kind of material worth. an importance that is personal and profound. from within ourselves we create meaning.
i think that’s really beautiful.
Follow me
Answer:
Hi dear army hope this helps you
Explanation:
value is a strange, illusory concept. how can a word be so universally understood and yet so difficult to define or even agree with? seriously, try to write out a satisfying definition of “value.” it’s not easy. when I was in my third year of university I was part of a group that built a museum exhibit that explored the concept of value. we called it “beyond the dollar” — our bias was clear, but the sentiment was legitimate.
in it, we presented four subcategories of value: monetary value, instrumental value (i.e. the utility of something), individual or personal value, and value to a community (or city or country or continent, you get the idea). while the categories formed a useful classification system and a structure for exploring the concept of value, they fail(ed) to encapsulate the richness and complexity of what makes things valuable or not. or valuable to some and not to others. or valuable to one person and no one else.
the idea of something having “monetary value” is fairly well understood. goods and services cost money. generally, we all agree fairly closely on what different things are worth. occasionally we will be shocked or surprised at something’s assigned monetary value, but we can still understand how that value is expressed: money or credit is given in exchange for something, or something is retained by a person or group due to its financial potential.
what is lost in these dry, straightforward definitions is exactly what I find most interesting about the idea of value. for example, saying something has monetary value does nothing to help you understand the work that someone put in to get the money they used to purchase the said thing. what kind of effort and love and frustration was poured from someone’s body to obtain the capital needed to make something as simple as a purchase?
or for instrumental value: what kind of time and effort was put in by the person using the object? for example, a fishing rod has instrumental value — it allows someone to catch fish. but saying it has the potential to catch fish and therefore has some level of utility does nothing to describe the dedication and commitment of the fisherperson wielding the rod. how many thousands of hours have they put into honing their craft, their passion?
to answer the question: there are plenty of items I own that aren’t worth any money but mean the world to me. I’ve got a box filled with letters from friends and family. each one of those is deeply precious to me. I have stacks of photographs — yes, physical photographs — that aren’t worth a dime but bring me such rich nostalgia and emotion. like most of you, I’ve got articles of clothing that I never wear but would never dream of discarding.
value is a quintessentially human concept. we assign such importance to objects, the importance that transcends any kind of material worth. an importance that is personal and profound. from within ourselves, we create meaning.
I think that’s really beautiful.