History, asked by yourstube251201, 4 hours ago

write essays on the reformation measurement of tsar Alexander 3​

Answers

Answered by krishnabenpatel07
0

Answer:

fThe reign of Tsar Alexander II was one that demonstrated a great

change in action, attitude and policy to that of his father, Tsar

Alexander II, 'The Tsar Liberator.' Historians have long labelled Tsar

Alexander II as a Liberal, reforming ruler and his son as a

reactionary, oppressive heir to his legacy. Hingley argues that his

thirteen years of reign were spent '...systematically destroying all

of his father's work. The choice facing Tsar Alexander III when he

ascended to the throne was a difficult one. There were two routes that

he could follow: to continue the tentative steps that his father had

made into reform or to back track into Conservatism in an attempt to

strengthen the autocracy.

By the time of his accession the Tsarevich had already been heavily

influenced by his tutor, the ultra - conservative, Pobedonestov, and

was thus firmly set against his father's policies concerning reform.

This influence that Pobedonestov held continued into Tsar Alexander

III's reign. Hite describes Pobedonestov; 'He believed that autocracy

was the only possible basis of government for Russia and that Tsar

Alexander II's reforms were criminal acts.' Van der Kiste describesTsar Alexander III as '...never the most original of thinkers...' who was incredibly influenced by his mother's confessor Father Bashanovand the '...arch conservative...' Pobedonestov. It was Pobedonestovwho impressed, so vigorously, upon the Tsarevich that reform was

dangerous and should be prevented at all costs. It was with this

attitude that Tsar Alexander II had allowed his son to grow up, an

ideology and attitude that was almost the opp...

... middle of paper ...

...that they

were polarised in the methods of reign. Tsar Alexander III embarked

upon industrialisation, which, though he never meant it to be, can be

seen as a reforming action. His father, had toyed with the idea of

reform but had drawn back, appalled at what he had unleashed,

desperately back tracking most of the reforms. His son finished this

off for him. Yet, there is distinctive evidence to suggest that, just

before his death he had planned a far-reaching reform. Melilikov was

unable to persuade Tsar Alexander III of this though, and that

legislation proved to be defunct. However, much as t is possible to

draw some vague, if not tenuous comparisons between the two tsars it

must be acknowledged that the reign of Tsar Alexander III marked a

great change and movement away from that of his father, Tsar Alexander

Similar questions