English, asked by CandyCakes, 1 month ago

Write in not more than 300 words in the following topic
Cigarette smoking in public places should not be allowed. Argue for or against the sentence


❌❌No spamming❌❌​

Answers

Answered by Faithsara
1

Answer:

Cigarette smoking should not be allowed in public places for the simple reason that people who do not like to smoke will also be affected. Passive smoking is a term used for people who accidentally inhale cigarette smoke.

Those who do not intend to smoke should not be forced to inhale unclean air. Smoking also tends to pollute a place. Public places should be pollution free and have clean air around them.

Answered by beherasaishib
2

AGAINST:-Smoking should definatly be banned in public places. The places they do allow smoking might lose a bit of money, but it will also help with the health problems that occur. Most people beleive that someone who is not in the smoking area of the public place will not be affected by the smoke, but smoke is able to spread in a room and affect the people around. Smoking causes a lot of problems not only for the smoker, but for the people around. If someone were to put together a protest for those to stop smoking in public, I bet that every non- smoker would say they should.

I doubt that the bars are shutting down JUST BECAUSE smokers choose not to go. Oh and by your logic, if someone is a pyromaniac and always has the need to light fires that its ok for them to run around in public with fire, the non pyromaniacs just need to avoid the fire. No big deal right?

Firstly, being in High School and being surrounded by smoke after school isn't even a little bit pleasent. All of the older kids smoke so the youger kids like to be influenced by the Juniors and Seniors. They will eventually start and get into the habit of smoking. Its also very unhealthy. Secondly, being in a restaurant and having to smell that smoke while eating is not only disrespectful but also disturbing and once again not healthy. I respect those who smoke away.

Another reason is smoking will become a tendency, which lures a lot of young people to do so. In fact, according to some reliable surveys, numbers of smokers are rapidly increasing these day. Of course, we can smoke if this will affect no one. We together make some tigh and strict regulation for smokers if we don't want to have any adverse influences on our next generations.

You want to solve unemployment by killing everyone with cancer

FOR:-smoking is up to the individual not others if people don’t like smoke avoid the people who are smoking. I would not say that smoking should be banned, but I do not think it is necessary that people should go as far to have to avoid another person purely for them being a smoker. What I think they should do is just go back to a smoking section with air vents leading upwards and away from people in the smoking section, making it less likely that if a door is opened to the smoking section, that smoke will go out. Also, business are not losing a little bit of money, there are bars that have been there for years all around me that are being completely shut down. All because people will not go there because they cannot smoke.

it seems clear to me that most people have their opinions against smoking. nevertheless, smoking still has some positive aspect to economic sides. For example, many countries around the world, especially tropical nations, like Cuba as well as England consider cigarette as an important product to export to many other countries to get money or exchange other commodities. therefore, they can use that money to invest in some different kinds of fields. furthermore, in my country, selling cigarettes is also an easy job that everyone can do to earn more money, no matter how old they are. As a result, this can bring some jobs for people and partially solve rate of unemployment.

Similar questions
Math, 20 days ago