write the details, why aeroponic is better in India or why it is not better in India
Answers
Explanation:
If you are asking about technology’s ability to grow food, both will do fine. They both are different means to same end.
If you are talking about complexity, Aeroponics is more complex and less forgiving than hydroponics. It needs a higher level of automation and thus higher set-up costs too which dissuade most people from experimenting in it.
About yields, aeroponics is supposed to offer better yield but in absence of any head to head comparison between yield and cost data for aeroponics vs hydroponics in Indian scenario, majority of commercial establishments are using hydroponics in India.
Explanation:
Aeroponics is the process of growing plants in an air or mist environment without the use of soil or an aggregate medium. The word "aeroponic" is derived from the Greek meanings of aer (ἀήρ, "air") and ponos (πόνος, "labour"). Aeroponic culture differs from both conventional hydroponics, aquaponics, and in-vitro (plant tissue culture) growing. Unlike hydroponics, which uses a liquid nutrient solution as a growing medium and essential minerals to sustain plant growth, or aquaponics, which uses water and fish waste, aeroponics is conducted without a growing medium.[1][failed verification] It is sometimes considered[by whom?] a type of hydroponics, since water is used in aeroponics to transmit nutrients.