Question

Writing
presenting arguments
The author says-
1. This (the gharial) is a river-dweller
and eats only fish Unfortunately,
this choice of habitat and diet
has been the gharial's downfall.
(para 12)
2. The species faces an uncertain
future and its survival is closely
linked with the needs of
the humans dependent
on the rivers. (para 16)
This shows a very difficult choice-if the gharials are to prosper, the humans dependent on
rivers have to suffer-and if the humans go on using the rivers, the Gharials will suffer.
Which do you think is more important? Can we argue that one side should make a sacrifice
for the other? Do you think there is a way of finding a solution that will benefit both sides?
State your own view of the problem and the best possible solution, in two
paragraphs. State the problem briefly. Refer to the argument in support of
the gharial and any argument you can see on the opposite side. Then say what
you think might be the solution.
​

Answer 1

Answer:

puri ki puri book wah eah hfi