Wrong use of scientists and development
Answers
Answer:
Scientific research can change our lives for the better, but it also presents risks – either through deliberate misuse or accident. Think about studying deadly pathogens; that's how we can learn how to successfully ward them off, but it can be a safety issue too, as when CDC workers were exposed to anthrax in 2014 after an incomplete laboratory procedure left spores of the bacterium alive.
Answer:
Mark my answer as BRAINLIEST.
There are different versions of this. Sometimes there are a few other steps in there, but they're all variations on the same idea. Here is a typical recipe:
Start with a problem. Why would you do something scientific if not to solve a problem, right? (Wrong.) Example: Which brand of battery lasts the longest?
Research. You can't do any science without first looking at what has already been done on this topic. How else could you stand on the shoulders of giants?
Create a hypothesis. In science fairs, this is basically an "educated guess." Example: I think that the Duracell batteries will last the longest.
Perform the experiment. How can you have a science project without data? Example: Connect different batteries to light bulbs and see which one lasts the longest.
Analyze the data. You have to do something to the data. If it is just raw data, it isn't science. Example: Average the times for different batteries to keep the bulbs glowing. Oh, if you need to, you can go back to your research and start the process over. This is sort of like using your last bird in Angry Birds but you didn't knock over all the pigs. You start over.
Create a conclusion. I recommend always starting your conclusion with "My hypothesis was correct." Example: The average time for Duracell batteries was the longest. They are the best.