Question

x a physician in new delhi, took y as his assistant for three years during which y agreed not to practic of his own in delhi. at the end ofthe years from the date of agreement with x,y began his independent practice while still in service. has x any legal remedy against y ? disscus​

Answer 1

Answer:

yes x will have a legal remedy

Answer 2

Concept:-

A phrase set up of a subject, verb, object, and modifiers. A grouping of modifiers, a subject, a verb, and an object. A sentence that is constructed with a subject, verb, object, and modifiers. a combination of subjects, verbs, objects, and modifiers.

Given:-

Given that the sentence “$x$ a physician in New Delhi, took y as his assistant for three years during which $y$ agreed not to practice of his own in Delhi. at the end of the years from the date of agreement with $x,y$began his independent practice while still in service.”

Find:-

We have to find that the has x any legal remedy against $y$? disscus​.

Solution:-

• The correct answer is it is legal.
• An arrangement, the essential object of which is to manage business and not to control it, is substantial. Subsequently, an understanding in the idea of a business blend between merchants or producers e.g., not to sell their merchandise under a specific cost, to pool benefits or result and to partition a similar in a concurred extent doesn't add up to a limit of exchange and is entirely substantial.

Hence, the correct answer is $x$ can take legal action against $y$.

#SPJ3