Computer Science, asked by bangtanarmy91, 6 months ago

You are a commander of a top secret nuclear defence installation. The government is considering
to deploy an Al-based 'Smart Protector". The protector will scan the internet for information and
automatically launch nuclear weapons if it finds any attack on the country. Will you allow the
deployment of this AI? Give reasons.​

Answers

Answered by anshul24122
15

Answer:

please mark as brainlist please

Explanation:

Today’s nuclear balance relies on several conditions that may not hold. Progress in computing and data availability are making it possible for machines to accomplish many tasks that once required human effort or were considered altogether impossible. This artificial intelligence (AI) might portend new capabilities that could spur arms races or increase the likelihood of states escalating to nuclear use—either intentionally or accidentally—during a crisis.1 T he RAND Corporation convened a series of workshops that brought together experts in AI and nuclear security to explore ways that AI might be a stabilizing—or destabilizing—force by the year 2040. The effect of AI on nuclear strategy depends as much or more on adversaries’ perceptions of its capabilities as on what it can actually do. For instance, it is extremely technically challenging for a state to develop the ability to locate and target all enemy nuclear-weapon launchers, but such an ability also yields an immense strategic advantage. States therefore covet this capability and might pursue it irrespective of technical difficulties and the potential to alarm rivals and increase the likelihood of conflict. The case could be made on technical grounds that advanced AI would still struggle to overcome obstacles originating from data limitations and information-theoretic arguments, but the tracking and targeting system needs only to be perceived as capable to be destabilizing. A capability that is nearly effective might be even more dangerous than one that already works. T he trajectory of AI development, together with that of complementary information technology and other advancements, will have a large effect on nuclear-security issues in the next quarter century. AI technology could continue to evolve rapidly, as it has in recent years, or it could plateau once current techniques mature. Some theorists postulate that machines might develop the ability to improve their own intelligence at some point, resulting in “superintelligences” with abilities that humans could neither comprehend nor control, but there is little consensus about how AI will advance, including the plausibility of superintelligences. Some envision an initial breakthrough followed by setbacks; others suspect that progress will remain incremental. T he two extreme cases have only limited relevance for the future of nuclear warfare. Stalling development (also referred to as AI winter) would result in only minor changes from the current nuclear-security environment. With superintelligence, AI would render the world unrecognizable and either save or destroy humanity in the process. The other two cases, in which AI progresses substantially and enables many new capabilities while still remaining fallible and inferior to humans in at least 1

Answered by FairyLight
30

Answer:

Today's nuclear balance relies on several conditions that may not hold. The RAND Corporation convenced a series of workshops that brought together experts in AI & nuclear security to explore ways that AI might be a stabilizing or destabilising force by the year 2040 . For instance, it is extremely technically challenging for a state to develop the ability to locate & target all enemy nuclear-weapon launchers, but such an ability also yields an immense strategic advantage. The case could be made on technical grounds that advanced AI would still struggle to over come obstacles originating from data limitations & infirmations like theoretic arguments, but the tracking & targeting system needs only to be perceived as capable to be destabilizing. AI technology could continue to evolve rapidly, as it has it recent in years. The 2 extreme cases have only limited relevance for the future nuclear warfare. With superintelligence, AI would render the unrecongnizable & either save or destroy humanity in the process.

Explanation:

Hope this answer will help you dear...

Similar questions