Your teacher conducted a debate in your class on the topic " Schools must develop scientific temperament in students". Write any two arguments that you used to supplement your stand, either as a propostion speaker or as an opposition one.
Answers
Answer:
The group then need another sheet of paper on which they write 1-9 down the side. From the brainstorm they need to identify between 7 and 9 arguments. They may have more than these so to get them down they can:
Scrap small or insignificant arguments
Join together similar arguments to make larger ones
On their sheet they need to write the names of the arguments. EACH NAME SHOULD BE NO LONGER THAN THREE WORDS.
They then need to divide the arguments between the first three speakers. The first speaker should have three arguments. The second and third speaker should have two or three arguments. The fourth speaker does not have any new arguments.
Answer:
Explanation:
Proposition:
Developing scientific temperament in students promotes critical thinking, and problem-solving skills, and encourages innovation.
Scientific education helps students to understand the natural world and its complexities, which can help them to appreciate and protect the environment, and make informed decisions about their health and well-being.
Opposition:
Focusing solely on scientific education may limit students’ exposure to other fields, such as the arts, humanities, and social sciences, which are also important for holistic development.
The pressure to excel in science may lead to a narrow focus on rote learning and test-taking, which may not necessarily lead to a genuine interest in the subject or a deeper understanding of scientific concepts.