Sociology, asked by plynath49673, 1 day ago

৭| কিয় মিছনেৰীসকলে ভাৰতীয় সমাজৰ সামাজিক ভিত্তিক সমর্থন কৰা নাছিল। তেওঁলােকৰ অধ্যয়নৰাজিৰ আধাৰত আলােচনা কৰা।

Answers

Answered by mohnishkrishna05
0

Answer:

Mark me as brainliest and give a thank u for more support

Explanation:

Generally, a missionary movement presupposes a group of people who take it as their religious duty to spread their religion to other parts of the World. It is to  make others conform to the same belief that a missionary movement is organised.

The British Government had three roles in India, first that of a trader, second that of ruler and then that of a Christian propagandist.

British rulers held and professed Christianity. Consequently British rule was equated with Christian domination.

Early years of British rule: Upto 1813

In the early years of its rule the Company had taken a position of neutrality with regard to the religious and social affairs of its subject. selfstudyhistory.com

The East India Company decided not to interfere with the traditional cultures of the people by supporting missionary work.

The company’s policy was non-interference in Indian education but favouring traditional oriental learning.

The non-interference probably based was on the fear that missionaries through English education expecting to aid conversions might offend the Hindu subjects of the company and create unrest.

They felt that the missionaries would encourage the religious sentiments among the people in India that could affect the business policy and the diplomatic role of the East India Company.

(This policy of non-interference with the customs and traditions of the natives and lack of support for missionary work were reviewed after the Company Charter was reviewed in 1813.)

It  was  during  the  1770s  and  1780s  that  several  Englishmen,  such  as  Edmund  and  Burke,  argued  that  the  East  India  Company’s  power  could  not  be  justified  unless  it  were exercised  with  morality  and  subject  to  Parliament’s control.  But  there  efforts  were  not  paid heed to.

Then Charles Grant, a junior officer in British East India Company,  drafted  the  original  proposal  for  mission  in  1786-87,  in  their  personal  capacity,  and campaigned  for  it  for  decades  at  their  own  expense.

Grant  sought  only  for  an  official endorsement of the East India Company for his proposal to start a missionary endeavour.

He neither sought for Company’s money nor its manpower. He himself offered support to one of the missionaries  from  his  personal  capacity.

Yet  he was  only  given  a  hearing  to  Lord Cornwallis.

However, though Lord Cornwallis assured him that he would not oppose the move for  missions,  he  could  not,  as  the  Governor  General,  give  his  active  support.

Grant  was therefore forced to go to the Christian leaders in  England, who were big enough to influence the Government or big enough to fight the Company.

Similar questions