1. Elaborate on the differences between the Turkish invaders-Ghazni and Ghori.
Answers
Answer:
HELLO ANSWER IS
Explanation:
Mahmud was a great conqueror and he never faced any defeat in his 17 invasions of India. On the other hand, Ghori had to face a number of defeats. Not only this he lost his life at the hands of his enemy in India and did not reach his kingdom of Ghazni. Even in Central Asia, Mahmud was more successful and Ghori had to face defeat.
Mahmud did not try to establish his empire in India. He was more interested in plundering the wealth of India. Mahmud was more of a fanatic who wanted to spread Islam in India. He destroyed temples and idols of Hindu gods. His attacks were mostly directed on the religious places of the Hindus. Ghori on the other hand directed his attacks on important towns and forts.
Answer:
Mohamad Ghori
- His aim was to create an empire in India.
- He established his rule in India.
- But during the time of his invasion India was strong enough to fight against him.
- Prithviraj Chauhan defeated Mohamad Ghori in the 1st battle of Tarain.
- But won in the 2nd battle and took over the North India.(which was later came to known as Nd Ajmer).
- Prithviraj Chauhan took most of the Rajputs under his shelter to defeat Mohamad Ghori which was successful only in the first battle of Tarain.
Mohamad of Ghazni
- He came to Indian in the intention of taking all the wealth from India.
- He came to India in 11th century.
- He wanted to spread Islam all around India.
- He was a protector of Islamic.
- His attacks were more on religious places i.e. Hindu temples. He even took more wealth from temples
- During Mohamad of Ghazni time of invasion India was divided into small division.