1 minute speech on "science and religion should coexist"
Answers
Answer: science is the logical reason behind an activity and religion is the whole which consists of peoples belief and truth. when we talk about these two concepts coexisting that does not involve proving any superiority over each other but interdependence on each other. science gives the hidden story about any incident happening in this world , science not only includes experiments and inventions but a part of science helps people know even the outcome on any activity. on the other hand people have taken religion and its practices as a platform for identification of different sects of society , but the truth is religion is universe of all the beliefs , ethics, traditions, and truths which a human being should follow to live a happy life. here i am talking about human beings because any concept which helps to solve problems of life and world is not a property of any single being on this planet. just like the facts of science are universal the religious traditions and beliefs have reasons behind there existence. its a different thing when in the name of religion people start creating myths . the reason behind people becoming atheist is the lack of knowledge about the scientific reason which holds a religious tradition. when the science and religion will be weighed on the same platform people will start comprehending the underlying reason about the traditions and before naming it absurd they will get to know the sanctity of it.
Explanation:
Explanation:
ADVERTISEMENT
Students in classrooms with windows that open out to nature in all its glory may perform better on tests.
This is not fully established science, but Heather Tallis, an ecologist at the Nature Conservancy, is testing the idea in California and other states. She is using satellite data to image the sweeping California landscapes—mountains to deserts to inner cities—in the backyards of randomly chosen schools. And she is correlating the presence of nature to standardized test results. Her hypothesis, which may be disproved, is that students do well when they are surrounded by nature.
The study would be of great interest to parents, of course. And it also highlights a key debate raging through the conservation community: Does nature (biodiversity) have value even when it does not contribute to human well-being? If Tallis finds that seeing nature from school rooms does not help students, is nature still worth having around the school for its own sake?