Social Sciences, asked by andydean647, 9 months ago

1. To what extent did the Ottoman Empire speed up European colonization in North Africa.

2. Critically examine the consequences of Mohammed Ali's economic and social policies in Egypt.

3. Discuss the impact of religion on the independence struggle of anyone country in North Africa.

4. To what extent is the city distinct from the rural? what factors motivate the formation of cities?

Answers

Answered by badrinathgpm123
1

Answer:

The term Caribbean culture summarises the artistic, musical, literary, culinary, political and social elements that are representative of Caribbean people all over the world. The Caribbean's culture has historically been influenced by that of African, Amerindian, Indian And European traditions.

As a collection of settler nations, the contemporary Caribbean has been shaped by waves of migration that have combined to form a unique blend of customs, cuisine, and traditions that have marked the socio-cultural development of the area.

Development of

Answered by FanzyRacer
1

Answer:

Nature hates a vacuum. So do empires.

The Ottoman empire began slowly sliding towars dissolution by the end of the 18th century, with a string of defeats that ended its expansion and switched it to defensive posture. This process weakend its hold in the far reaches of the empire, in eastern Europe, western Asia, the Arabian peninsula and North Africa.

So, other empires swooped into the void. Russia and Austria whittled the Ottoman’s holdings in Europe from 1796 to 1913, while Russia threw them out of the Causcasus region, in their normal benevolent fashion (if you ignore half a dozen ethnic cleansings).

In North Africa, Egypt bolted first, When Muhammad Ali effectively broke away from central government. Then, France began to take over the the western reaches of Algeria, Tunisia and later Morocco. Even Italy, once it became unified in the 1860’s , launced into the empire game by taking Lybia off the market.

It was a slow process, taking the bulk of century. In many cases, local governors went along with the process, seeing little chance of the Ottomans boucing back from their decline.

Great Britain actually slowed the process considerably, as it viewed a weakend Ottoman empire in the Near East a better alternative to a European free for all across the region. in the Crimean waar of 1856 and the 1878 Berlin conference it establised itself as protector of the Ottomans, curbing Russian and Austrian aggressive postures, and only snapped Egypt into a protectorate land by reuest of the bankrupt Khediv and to protect its huge investment in completing the Suez Canal.

Had the Ottoman Empire stayed strong and vibrant, there would be not colonization of any of its parts, including the North Africa holdings. Not that they any god given right to hold these lands, the only right they had was the same as the Europeans that replaced it - the right of might.

PLS MARK AS BRAINIEST!!!

Similar questions