Question

23. For the common person, access to courts is access to justice. The courts exercise a crucial role

in interpreting the Fundamental Rights of citizens and as you saw in the above case, the courts

interpreted Article 21 of the Constitution on the Right to Life to include the Right to Food. They,

therefore, ordered the State to take certain steps to provide food for all including the mid-day

meal scheme.

However, there are also court judgments that people believe work against the best interests of

the common person. For example, activists who work on issues concerning the right to shelter

and housing for the poor believe that the recent judgments on evictions are a far cry from earlier

judgments. While recent judgments tend to view the slum dweller as an encroacher in the city,

earlier judgments (like the 1985 Olga Tellis vs Bombay Municipal Corporation) had tried to protect

the livelihoods of slum dwellers.

23.1 This passage is taken from which chapter of Social Science. Write name.

23.2 What do you mean by the mid day meal scheme?

23.3 Define article 21

23.4 Who have access to courts?​

Answer 1

Answer:

are koi mere jaise thode pagal se ladke ka new friend banjao please msg kro mujhe snap cht or ig pe jaldi kro yrr

snap cht - aaniya_malik21

ig - crazyaman0

Answer 2

Answer:

I don't know ok you girl