Question

3. In real life, sequencing data is never as clean and clear as the sequencing data presented here. Typically, sequencing machines do not read eDNA sequences perfectly, occasionally mistaking a C for a T, for instance (though this is often <1% of the time). Additionally, there will even be some variability of the barcode among individuals of the same species! How can sequences without 100% identity to a reference still be useful for biodiversity assessment?

Answer 1

Explanation:

❥︎

» » Hearthacker « «

${\large\blue{\mathbb\fcolorbox{aqua}{darkblue}{● QUESTION:}}}$

❥︎

______________________

${\large\blue{\mathbb\fcolorbox{aqua}{darkblue}{● ANSWER:}}}$

${\bold{\green{❥︎ \: Dᴇғɪɴɪᴛɪᴏɴ:}}}$

➪

${\bold{\green{❥︎\: Exᴀᴍᴘʟᴇ:}}}$

➪

_____________________

${\large\bold\orange{》 ❥︎ \:ꀍꏂ \: ꓄ꌚ \: ꀍᖘꌚ \: ꌩꀎ \:♡︎ 《}}》❥︎ꀍꏂ꓄ꌚꀍᖘꌚꌩꀎ♡︎《$

______________________

${\red{\huge\underbrace{Be\: Happy}}}$