Social Sciences, asked by MeetDoshi, 7 months ago

6) Directive Principles and Fundamental rights are not against each other instead they complement
each other.​

Answers

Answered by RAAZ34
14

Answer:

Explanation:

the Supreme Court said that no difference can be made between the two sets of rights. Fundamental rights deal with Civil and political rights whereas Directive Principles deals with social and economic rights. Directive Principles are not enforceable in a court of law doesn’t mean it is subordinate.

Therefore, court had tried to establish that Fundamental rights and directive principles are complementary and supplementary to each other. It helped in the socio-economic development of nation from micro to macro level.

Answered by shreya2005354
10

Answer:

Fundamental rights aim to establish political democracy in India whereas DPSP refers to socio-economic policies of the country. Directive principles are in the nature of instruments of instructions to the government to do positive. They are not justifiable or enforceable in courts.

Fundamental rights aim to establish political democracy in India whereas DPSP refers to socio-economic policies of the country. Directive principles are in the nature of instruments of instructions to the government to do positive. They are not justifiable or enforceable in courts.The Supreme Court held that the fundamental rights under Article 29(2) over the Directive principle under article 46. ... The Supreme Court began to assert that there is “no conflict on the whole” between the fundamental rights and the directive principles. They are complementary and supplementary to each other.

Fundamental rights aim to establish political democracy in India whereas DPSP refers to socio-economic policies of the country. Directive principles are in the nature of instruments of instructions to the government to do positive. They are not justifiable or enforceable in courts.The Supreme Court held that the fundamental rights under Article 29(2) over the Directive principle under article 46. ... The Supreme Court began to assert that there is “no conflict on the whole” between the fundamental rights and the directive principles. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. Rights are judicially enforceable whereas Directive Principles are not. According to Article 37 Directive Principle are Fundamental in the governance of the country and it shall be duty of the State to apply these principles in making laws, but they are not judicially enforceable by court.

Fundamental rights aim to establish political democracy in India whereas DPSP refers to socio-economic policies of the country. Directive principles are in the nature of instruments of instructions to the government to do positive. They are not justifiable or enforceable in courts.The Supreme Court held that the fundamental rights under Article 29(2) over the Directive principle under article 46. ... The Supreme Court began to assert that there is “no conflict on the whole” between the fundamental rights and the directive principles. They are complementary and supplementary to each other. Rights are judicially enforceable whereas Directive Principles are not. According to Article 37 Directive Principle are Fundamental in the governance of the country and it shall be duty of the State to apply these principles in making laws, but they are not judicially enforceable by court.Explanation:

hope this would be helpful to you

Similar questions