7
the examiner?
Neither the narrator nor Angela Smythe knew the answer to the questions. While in a similar situation as the narrator, what would you
have done?she
copied the answers from her cuff, he wrote a letter. Who, according to you, did the
better thing? If you were
Answers
Explanation:
Step-by-step explanation:
➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡
☆☞ [ Verified answer ]☜☆
examiner is the correct answer
jai siya ram☺ __/\__
➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️➡️
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
plz mark me as the brainliest
Answer:
Explanation:
Intelligence
Intelligence is a term describing one or more capacities of the mind. In different contexts this can be defined in
different ways, including the capacities for abstract thought, understanding, communication, reasoning, learning,
planning, emotional intelligence and problem solving.
Intelligence is most widely studied in humans, but is also observed in animals and plants. Artificial intelligence is the
intelligence of machines or the simulation of intelligence in machines.
Numerous definitions of and hypotheses about intelligence have been proposed since before the twentieth century,
with no consensus reached by scholars. Within the discipline of psychology, various approaches to human
intelligence have been adopted. The psychometric approach is especially familiar to the general public, as well as
being the most researched and by far the most widely used in practical settings.[1]
History of the term
Intelligence derives from the Latin verb intelligere which derives from inter-legere meaning to "pick out" or discern.
A form of this verb, intellectus, became the medieval technical term for understanding, and a translation for the
Greek philosophical term nous. This term was however strongly linked to the metaphysical and cosmological
theories of teleological scholasticism, including theories of the immortality of the soul, and the concept of the Active
Intellect (also known as the Active Intelligence). This entire approach to the study of nature was strongly rejected by
the early modern philosophers such as Francis Bacon, Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and David Hume, all of whom
preferred the word "understanding" in their English philosophical works.[2] [3] Hobbes for example, in his Latin De
Corpore, used "intellectus intelligit" (translated in the English version as "the understanding understandeth") as a
typical example of a logical absurdity.
[4] The term "intelligence" has therefore become less common in English
language philosophy, but it has later been taken up (without the scholastic theories which it once implied) in more
contemporary psychology.
Definitions
Humans have pondered the nature of intelligence
for centuries.
How to define intelligence is controversial. Groups of scientists have
stated the following:
1. from "Mainstream Science on Intelligence" (1994), an editorial
statement by fifty-two researchers:
A very general mental capability that, among other things,
involves the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think
abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly and
learn from experience. It is not merely book learning, a
narrow academic skill, or test-taking smarts. Rather, it
reflects a broader and deeper capability for comprehending
our surroundings—"catching on," "making sense" of
things, or "figuring out" what to do.[5]
2. from "Intelligence: Knowns and Unknowns" (1995), a report
published by the Board of Scientific Affairs of the American
Psychological Association:
Intelligence 2
Individuals differ from one another in their ability to understand complex ideas, to adapt effectively to
the environment, to learn from experience, to engage in various forms of reasoning, to overcome
obstacles by taking thought. Although these individual differences can be substantial, they are never
entirely consistent: a given person's intellectual performance will vary on different occasions, in
different domains, as judged by different criteria. Concepts of "intelligence" are attempts to clarify and
organize this complex set of phenomena. Although considerable clarity has been achieved in some
areas, no such conceptualization has yet answered all the important questions, and none commands
universal assent. Indeed, when two dozen prominent theorists were recently asked to define intelligence,
they gave two dozen, somewhat different, definitions.[6] [7]