Math, asked by manpreetkaur00435, 9 months ago

8. Which of the following statements are true (T) and which are false (F)?
(a) Zero is the smallest natural number (b) 400 is the predecessor of 399.
(c) Zero is the smallest whole number. (d) 600 is the successor of 599.
(e) All natural numbers are whole numbers.
(1) All whole numbers are natural numbers.
(8) The predecessor of a two digit number is never a single digit number.
h) l is the smallest whole number.
(1) The natural number 1 has no predecessor,
(i) The whole number 1 has no predecessor,
c) The whole number 13 lies between 11 and 12.
(1) The whole number O has no predecessor.
(m) The successor of a two digit number is always a two digit number.
Whole Numbers​

Answers

Answered by Anonymous
5

Answer:

a. False

b. false

c. true

d.true

e. true

f. false

g.false

h. false

1. true

i. false

1. true

m. false

Answered by Anonymous
18

Step-by-step explanation:

(a) It is false because 0 is not a natural number.

(b) It is false because 400 is the successor of 399 but not the predecessor of 399.

(c) It is true. Whole number starts from 0.

(d) It is true because 599+1=600.

(e) It is true because when we add zero to the list of all natural number.We get all the whole numbers.

(f) It is false because 0 is a whole number but not a natural number.

(g) It is false. let's take an example,

predecessor of 10-1=9 which is a single digit number.

(h) It is false because 0 is the smallest whole number.

(i) It is false in the sense that predecessor of natural number 1 is the whole number 0.

(j) It is false.Predecessor of whole number 1 is whole number 0.

(k) It is false because there is no whole number between 11 and 12. 13 is successor of 12.

(l) It is true because the predecessor of whole number 0 is not a whole number.

(m) It is false. let's take an example,successor of 99=99+1 =100 which is a 3- digit number

Plz Mark it as a Brainlist!!

Similar questions