**98 POINTS** you are ramesh or Rejani .you are the member of SPCA in your society .write an article in about 100 to 120 words for publication in the forthcoming issue of the magazine "the week" on the home animals are constantly being ill -treated and what can be done to prevent it.
Answers
Article on magazine:-
Joe Brown — Editor-in-Chief, Popular Science
2017 has produced so much amazing journalism. I admire the investigative reporting into our broken political system as a craft beyond what I could ever achieve. I am in awe of Ronan Farrow’s ability to ignite a discussion about predation that will likely change our culture forever—hopefully for the better.
But my favorite (non-PopSci) story of 2017 is Caity Weaver’s profile of The Rock [for GQ.]
I’ve been all-in on Weaver since her all-you-can-eat-mozzarella-stick investigation at Gawker, and I’m thrilled that GQ has not sanitized her utterly unique voice. This profile is so much more than the typical “day with celebrity” story we’ve come to expect with every blockbuster release. The piece doesn’t just allow you to feel what it’s like to be around Dwayne Johnson, it makes you feel good about something in 2017. And that’s not just craft—it’s art.
Cruelty to animals, also called animal abuse or animal neglect, is both the unintentional (animal neglect) and the intentional infliction by humans of suffering or harm upon any non-human animal, regardless of whether the act is against the law. More narrowly, it can be the causing of harm or suffering for specific achievement, such as killing animals for food or for their fur; opinions differ about the extent of cruelty associated with a given method of slaughter. Cruelty to animals sometimes encompasses inflicting harm or suffering for personal amusement, as in zoosadism.
Cruelty to animals, also called animal abuse or animal neglect, is both the unintentional (animal neglect) and the intentional infliction by humans of suffering or harm upon any non-human animal, regardless of whether the act is against the law. More narrowly, it can be the causing of harm or suffering for specific achievement, such as killing animals for food or for their fur; opinions differ about the extent of cruelty associated with a given method of slaughter. Cruelty to animals sometimes encompasses inflicting harm or suffering for personal amusement, as in zoosadism.Laws concerning animal cruelty are designed to prevent the needless cruelty. Divergent approaches to such laws occur in different jurisdictions throughout the world. For example, some laws govern methods of killing animals for food, clothing, or other products, and other laws concern the keeping of animals for entertainment, education, research, or pets. Cruelty to animals is not necessarily the same thing as disrespect towards animals.
Cruelty to animals, also called animal abuse or animal neglect, is both the unintentional (animal neglect) and the intentional infliction by humans of suffering or harm upon any non-human animal, regardless of whether the act is against the law. More narrowly, it can be the causing of harm or suffering for specific achievement, such as killing animals for food or for their fur; opinions differ about the extent of cruelty associated with a given method of slaughter. Cruelty to animals sometimes encompasses inflicting harm or suffering for personal amusement, as in zoosadism.Laws concerning animal cruelty are designed to prevent the needless cruelty. Divergent approaches to such laws occur in different jurisdictions throughout the world. For example, some laws govern methods of killing animals for food, clothing, or other products, and other laws concern the keeping of animals for entertainment, education, research, or pets. Cruelty to animals is not necessarily the same thing as disrespect towards animals.Utilitarian advocates argue from the position of costs and benefits and vary in their conclusions as to the allowable treatment of animals. Some utilitarians argue for a weaker approach which is closer to the animal welfare position, whereas others argue for a position that is similar to animal rights. Animal rights theorists criticize these positions, arguing that the words "unnecessary" and "humane" are subject to widely differing interpretations, and that animals have basic rights. They say that the only way to ensure protection for animals is to end their status as property and to ensure that they are never used as commodities.