A girl on her scooter slows down and then stops when she rides into gravel
Answers
Explanation:
An object with forces acting on it can be moving at a constant velocity
as long as those forces are balanced. For example, if you ride a bike
straight ahead at a constant speed, the force moving the bike forward
exactly balances the forces of friction that would slow the bike down.
If you stop pedaling, the forces are no longer balanced, and frictional
forces slow you down until you eventually stop.
Balanced forces cannot change an object’s speed or its direction.
An unbalanced force is needed to change an object’s motion.
• To increase the speed of your bike, you may exert more forward
force by pedaling harder or changing gears. The net force moves
the bike ahead faster.
• To turn your bike, you apply an unbalanced force by leaning to
one side and turning the handlebars.
• To stop the bike, you use the extra force of friction that your bike
brakes provide.
check your reading What happens to a moving object if all the forces on it are
balanced? Which sentence above tells you?
Newton’s first law relates force and motion.
In the mid-1600s, the English scientist Sir Isaac Newton studied the
effects of forces on objects. He formulated three laws of motion that
are still helping people describe and predict the motions of objects
today. Newton’s ideas were built on those of other scientists, in partic-
ular the Italian scientist Galileo Galilei (gal-uh-LEE-oh gal-uh-LAY).
Both Galileo and Newton overturned thinking that had been accepted
since the times of the ancient Greek philosophers.
The ancient Greeks had concluded that it was necessary to apply a
continuous force to keep an object in motion. For example, if you set
a book on a table and give the book a quick push, the book slides a
short way and then stops. To keep the book moving, you need to keep
pushing it. The Greeks reasoned that the book stops moving because
you stop pushing it.
Galileo’s Thought Experiment
In the early 1600s, Galileo suggested a different way of interpreting
such observations. He imagined a world without friction and con-
ducted a thought experiment in this ideal world. He concluded that,
in the absence of friction, a moving object will continue moving even
if there is no force acting on it. In other words, it does not take a force
to keep an object moving; it takes a force—f