a resident of himachal Pradesh want to file a pitition related to the violation of a fundamental right, in which court he will go. pllllz help me soon thanku
Answers
Answered by
0
Himachal Pradesh High Court
Gurdev Singh And Ors. Etc. vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Ors. on 14 March, 1991
Equivalent citations: AIR 1992 HP 70, 1992 CriLJ 2542
Author: B Singh
Bench: B Singh, D Gupta
JUDGMENT Bhawani Singh, J.
1. These criminal writ petitions, being common in nature, scope and effect are being decided by a common judgment and the learned counsel for the parties also agree that they should be so decided.
2. The petitioners, in both these petitions, are undergoing imprisonment in the jails of the State. They submitted the petitions to this Court which were placed on Judicial side for examination and decision by Chief Justice P.D. Desai, as he then was. In Criminal Writ Petition 6 of 1985 (Gurdev Sing v. State of H. P.) the petitioners complain that they are employed for work but are being paid Rs. 1.50 per day for the labour. They also say that no wages are paid for the first three months of labour. Jn Criminal Writ Petition No. 49 of 1985 (Bhag Singh Chauhan v. State of H. P.), in addition to the allegation of the improper management of wage amounts by the Superintendent of Jail and the Store Keeper, they also say that they are forced to work with contractors either at less wages or no wages at all. The allegation as to the mis-utilization of wage amounts were inquired into by the District and Sessions Judge, Shimla on the directions by this Court. However, the report discloses that the allegation of Bhag Singh, convict regarding the mis-utilization of the wage amounts against the jail officials has no substance. We have, therefore, no material before us to arrive at a conclusion favourable to the petitioner and against the jail officials. However, there is something to be said on the engagement, rate of wages, their receipt and management by the jail authorities, which aspect, we will turn to, at an appropriate place in the succeeding part of this judgment.
Gurdev Singh And Ors. Etc. vs State Of Himachal Pradesh And Ors. on 14 March, 1991
Equivalent citations: AIR 1992 HP 70, 1992 CriLJ 2542
Author: B Singh
Bench: B Singh, D Gupta
JUDGMENT Bhawani Singh, J.
1. These criminal writ petitions, being common in nature, scope and effect are being decided by a common judgment and the learned counsel for the parties also agree that they should be so decided.
2. The petitioners, in both these petitions, are undergoing imprisonment in the jails of the State. They submitted the petitions to this Court which were placed on Judicial side for examination and decision by Chief Justice P.D. Desai, as he then was. In Criminal Writ Petition 6 of 1985 (Gurdev Sing v. State of H. P.) the petitioners complain that they are employed for work but are being paid Rs. 1.50 per day for the labour. They also say that no wages are paid for the first three months of labour. Jn Criminal Writ Petition No. 49 of 1985 (Bhag Singh Chauhan v. State of H. P.), in addition to the allegation of the improper management of wage amounts by the Superintendent of Jail and the Store Keeper, they also say that they are forced to work with contractors either at less wages or no wages at all. The allegation as to the mis-utilization of wage amounts were inquired into by the District and Sessions Judge, Shimla on the directions by this Court. However, the report discloses that the allegation of Bhag Singh, convict regarding the mis-utilization of the wage amounts against the jail officials has no substance. We have, therefore, no material before us to arrive at a conclusion favourable to the petitioner and against the jail officials. However, there is something to be said on the engagement, rate of wages, their receipt and management by the jail authorities, which aspect, we will turn to, at an appropriate place in the succeeding part of this judgment.
awadheshyadav:
thank u very much bro
Similar questions