Biology, asked by aishu6620, 3 months ago

A student setup an experiment to study the effect of deforestation.The student took soil from a forested region and a barren land with no trees. The student added soil from the forested region with trees in Pot 1 and soil from barren land in Pot 2. In both the pots, a hibiscus plant was grown. After 1 month, the student observes that the plant in pot A shows growth while the plant in pot B shows minimal growth. What is the likely reason for this observation?

Answers

Answered by prityanshujasrotia
6

Answer:

don't know ? I will tell u

Explanation:

well I think it's because the barren land is without any plants for such a long time that's why its nutrients are not yet giving it to the plant

and the forested land has nutrients cause it has give nutrients to many other plants so it's nutrient value is working

mark me blainliest I want to go to other rank

Answered by zumba12
0

The reason for this observation is Soil from barren land is less fertile.

Explanation:

  • The serpentine-rich soil formed by hydration corrosion and metamorphic alteration of ultramafic igneous bedrock distinguishes serpentine barrens.
  • Serpentine barrens are frequently described as high-stress habitats with limited access to water and nutrients. Cemetery soil fertility can range from poor to high.
  • Whenever the amounts of nutrients withdrawn from the soil in harvested products exceeds the amounts of nutrients provided, soil fertility decrease occurs. In this case, the crop's nutritional requirements are covered by soil resources until these stores are depleted.
Similar questions