Acid Base Reactions advantages and disadvantages
Answers
Answered by
2
Advantages of Brownsted Lowrt thoery....
The defination of acid and base by Brownsted Lowry has numerous advantages as compared to Arrhenius.
Advantages of Arrhenius theory...
Most of priotic acid which separate in aqueous solution in order to increase in cocentration are H+ ion are alike properties that r...
HCL+NaOH→→→→NaCl +H2O
As we can see that the basicity of acid r dependent on the amount of no. of H+ ion released in a aquoes solution
Disadvantage of Brownsted Lowry theory...
It doesn't have many limitations exect two or more the one were the reaction between acidic oxide and basic oxides cannot be explained.
Disadvantages of Arrhenius theory
Arrhenius theory had some limitation one of them was that his theory was restricted to involving aquoes solutions. When water is solvent many acid base reaction , but this is not always the case. his theory later on became limited to the acid and base of ionic compound that either produce hydrogen ion or hydroxide ions
hope this helps u
The defination of acid and base by Brownsted Lowry has numerous advantages as compared to Arrhenius.
Advantages of Arrhenius theory...
Most of priotic acid which separate in aqueous solution in order to increase in cocentration are H+ ion are alike properties that r...
HCL+NaOH→→→→NaCl +H2O
As we can see that the basicity of acid r dependent on the amount of no. of H+ ion released in a aquoes solution
Disadvantage of Brownsted Lowry theory...
It doesn't have many limitations exect two or more the one were the reaction between acidic oxide and basic oxides cannot be explained.
Disadvantages of Arrhenius theory
Arrhenius theory had some limitation one of them was that his theory was restricted to involving aquoes solutions. When water is solvent many acid base reaction , but this is not always the case. his theory later on became limited to the acid and base of ionic compound that either produce hydrogen ion or hydroxide ions
hope this helps u
mikooo:
thanks sir
sir not sis
Answered by
1
Advantages of the Bronsted-Lowry theory The definition of acids and bases by Bronsted-Lowry has numerous advantages compared to Arrhenius. Since of its advantages, when the words acid and base come to a chemists usage they are directly mentioning to a Bronsted-Lowry acid or base theory. This theory illuminates the association between the strengths of an acid and its conjugate base. The relationship can be explained by if an acid is strong, the conjugate base will be weaker and the stronger a base is the conjugate acid will be weaker. Unlike Arrhenius’s theory, Bronsted- Lowry’s clarifies the role in water taking place in reactions of acid- base i.e. H3O+ ions forms from acids when water accepts H+ ions. It can be modified to add solutes rather than water and reactions that happen in the solid or gas phases. The theory can also clarify the smoothening result of water which is the fact that the stronger the acids and bases are they will have the same strong strength when they are dissolved in water. Nevertheless, acids and bases can also remain as ions or neutral molecules and enlighten the difference in the relative strength of a set of acids or bases.
Advantages of the Arrhenius theory
Most of the protic acids which separates in aqueous solution in order to increase the concentration of H+ ion are alike properties which are shown here:
HCl + NaOH → NaCl + H2O
HNO3 + KOH → KNO3 + H2O
An example of the reaction taking place with bases outcomes in neutralization of the acid and formation of a salt and water.
As we can see above in the equation, the basicity of the acids are dependent on the amount of number of H+ ions it releases in an aqueous solution. The same thing is with the pH of any substance which is dependent on the number of H+ ions the substance releases in solution.Disadvantages of the Bronsted-Lowry theory
The Bronsted-Lowry theory doesn’t have many limitations, except for two. The one were the reactions between acidic oxides and basic oxides can not be explained. Regarding the acidic oxides there are for example carbon dioxide (CO2), sulphur dioxide (SO2) or sulphur trioxide (SO3) and more. Regarding the basic oxides there are for example calcium oxide (CaO), magnesium oxide (MgO) or hypobromite (BrO) and more. Even in the absence of the solvent these oxides take place. Another limitation of the Bronsted-Lowry theory is that some substances that don’t consist of protons to donate, acts like acids, such as aluminium chloride (AlCl3) or boron trifluoride (BF3) etc.
The Bronsted-Lowry theory is anyhow the theory which chemists usually use when they are trying to prove some of their work. This is because it’s more reliable and useful than Arrhenius theory. Not that it in any way goes against Arrhenius theory, but because it supports and increases the understanding and the use of both theories together. Disadvantages of the Arrhenius theory
Arrhenius theory had some limitations. One of them was that his theory was restricted to reactions involving aqueous solutions. When water is the solvent, many acid-base reactions do occur, but this it’s not always the case. His theory later on became limited to the acid and bases of ionic compounds, that either produced hydrogen ions or hydroxide ions, such as hydrochloric acid andsodium hydroxide. Looking at ammonia (NH3), which does not produce hydroxide ions, but do act as a base in aqueous solutions, tells us that it the Arrhenius theory is not confirmed here. This does not only apply for NH3, but there are also other substances of this case that don’t reach the requirements of the Arrhenius def
Advantages of the Arrhenius theory
Most of the protic acids which separates in aqueous solution in order to increase the concentration of H+ ion are alike properties which are shown here:
HCl + NaOH → NaCl + H2O
HNO3 + KOH → KNO3 + H2O
An example of the reaction taking place with bases outcomes in neutralization of the acid and formation of a salt and water.
As we can see above in the equation, the basicity of the acids are dependent on the amount of number of H+ ions it releases in an aqueous solution. The same thing is with the pH of any substance which is dependent on the number of H+ ions the substance releases in solution.Disadvantages of the Bronsted-Lowry theory
The Bronsted-Lowry theory doesn’t have many limitations, except for two. The one were the reactions between acidic oxides and basic oxides can not be explained. Regarding the acidic oxides there are for example carbon dioxide (CO2), sulphur dioxide (SO2) or sulphur trioxide (SO3) and more. Regarding the basic oxides there are for example calcium oxide (CaO), magnesium oxide (MgO) or hypobromite (BrO) and more. Even in the absence of the solvent these oxides take place. Another limitation of the Bronsted-Lowry theory is that some substances that don’t consist of protons to donate, acts like acids, such as aluminium chloride (AlCl3) or boron trifluoride (BF3) etc.
The Bronsted-Lowry theory is anyhow the theory which chemists usually use when they are trying to prove some of their work. This is because it’s more reliable and useful than Arrhenius theory. Not that it in any way goes against Arrhenius theory, but because it supports and increases the understanding and the use of both theories together. Disadvantages of the Arrhenius theory
Arrhenius theory had some limitations. One of them was that his theory was restricted to reactions involving aqueous solutions. When water is the solvent, many acid-base reactions do occur, but this it’s not always the case. His theory later on became limited to the acid and bases of ionic compounds, that either produced hydrogen ions or hydroxide ions, such as hydrochloric acid andsodium hydroxide. Looking at ammonia (NH3), which does not produce hydroxide ions, but do act as a base in aqueous solutions, tells us that it the Arrhenius theory is not confirmed here. This does not only apply for NH3, but there are also other substances of this case that don’t reach the requirements of the Arrhenius def
plz mark as brainliest
Similar questions