Question

advantages and disadvantages of colation government

Answer 1

Answer:

Alliance govts are formed worldwide and they usually result when there is no single leader of any political party who has the charisma to fire imagination of electorate. When tall leaders like Nehru and Indira Gandhi led their party they always ruled without alliance but smaller leaders like V P Singh, Morarji Desai, Gouda, Chandrasekhar and to a certain extent even Vajapayee had to rule with alliance.

Alliance govts are formed worldwide and they usually result when there is no single leader of any political party who has the charisma to fire imagination of electorate. When tall leaders like Nehru and Indira Gandhi led their party they always ruled without alliance but smaller leaders like V P Singh, Morarji Desai, Gouda, Chandrasekhar and to a certain extent even Vajapayee had to rule with alliance.These very examples show the biggest defect-cons-of alliance govt namely stability. Each member party has its own mill to grind designed to maximize their vote base, control more levers of power to get maximum financial advantage and a dream to either rule as a single majority party or win enough seats to become kingmaker. Within parties there are ambitious individual leaders who also exert pressure on the alliance leader.

Alliance govts are formed worldwide and they usually result when there is no single leader of any political party who has the charisma to fire imagination of electorate. When tall leaders like Nehru and Indira Gandhi led their party they always ruled without alliance but smaller leaders like V P Singh, Morarji Desai, Gouda, Chandrasekhar and to a certain extent even Vajapayee had to rule with alliance.These very examples show the biggest defect-cons-of alliance govt namely stability. Each member party has its own mill to grind designed to maximize their vote base, control more levers of power to get maximum financial advantage and a dream to either rule as a single majority party or win enough seats to become kingmaker. Within parties there are ambitious individual leaders who also exert pressure on the alliance leader.All these pressures and demands does not allow the alliance leader to follow any specific agenda designed for welfare of the people. He has to look over his shoulder frequently before taking any decision. Beurocracy also understands the situation and dithers before implementing any govt orders. It all leads to kind of chaos, slowdown in govt functioning and high dissatisfaction among people. Sensing that the govt is about to collapse, the alliance partners start pulling out fearing people’s backlash in next election which becomes necessary. Thus alliance governments lead to frequent mid term elections causing hardship and waste of lot of money.

lead to frequent mid term elections causing hardship and waste of lot of money.This has also been the experience of other nations like UK, Israel etc.

lead to frequent mid term elections causing hardship and waste of lot of money.This has also been the experience of other nations like UK, Israel etc.Possibly only good thing about alliance govt situation is that it does not allow a single party and a single leader to become super confident and dictatorial.

HOPE IT HELPS U...

THANKU...

PLZ MARK IT AS BRAINLIST !!

Answer 2

Answer:

Advantages:

1. Enlarges your base of support, networks and connections; gives strength in numbers: you can achieve more together than you can alone.
2. Provides safety for advocacy efforts and protection for members who may not be able to take action alone, particularly when operating in a hostile or difficult environment.
3. Magnifies existing financial and human resources by pooling them together and by delegating work to others in the coalition.
4. Reduces duplication of effort and resources.
5. Enhances the credibility and influence of an advocacy campaign, as well as that of individual coalition members.
6. Helps develop new leadership skills amongst members.
7. Assists in individual and organizational networking.
8. Facilitates exchange of information, skills, experience, materials, opportunities for collaboration etc.
9. Brings together a diverse range of people and organizations. Diversity can strengthen a campaign by broadening perspective and understanding of the issue. It can also assist outreach by appealing to a wider population base with differing priorities and interests.
10. Provides peer support, encouragement, motivation and professional recognition.

Disadvantages:

1. Can lack clear objectives, or be difficult to agree common objectives.
2. Forming and managing a coalition can be a very time-consuming and bureaucratic process that can take away time from working directly on campaign issues and organizational tasks.
3. May be dominated by one powerful organization. Power is not always distributed equally among members; larger or richer organizations can have more say in decisions.
4. May require you to compromise your position on issues or tactics.
5. Shared decision-making can be slow and may paralyze progress.
6. Can often be constrained by a lack of resources.
7. Potential for donor interference (e.g. a donor is interested in funding certain activities but there is a danger of planning activities only because you know you can get the funds).
8. You may not always get credit for your work. Sometimes the coalition as a whole gets recognition rather than individual members. Or certain members get or claim more recognition than others, causing conflict and resentment.
9. If the coalition process breaks down it can harm everyone's advocacy by damaging members' credibility.
10. Coalition activities can be difficult to monitor and evaluate.