advantages
of marcial law
Answers
Answer:
It depends on who imposes martial law.
When there is severe disorder in a country leading to anarchy, the struggling civilian government may call upon the country's military forces to restore law and order by violent means if, when and where necessary. The immediate benefit is that the country is stabilized. If the army is then withdrawn, and it does withdraw on orders from the civilian government, the benefit to be got is got.
There are two other scenarios.
Firstly, the civilian government may not be able to withdraw. In that case the natural consequence is that the civilian government is driven out and a mulitary dictatorship takes over. This us a state of permanent martial law.
Secondly, a failed civilian government may not have adequate control over its military in times if anarchy. It would be apprehensive of a military takeover and therefore refrains from calling on the military to restore law and order. In that case the military may remove the civilian government forcibly and take over the Government. This again is a military dictatorship with permanent martial law.
Military dictatorships are like local mafioso. They are very powerful in their own location. Outside this they have not much power or influence. This leads to isolation and a state of permanent decay.
.
.
.
.
.
hope it helps you...