An outline of the essay marxism and literature by edmund wilson
Answers
Answered by
2
A Critical Analysis of Marxism and Literature by Wilson’s “Marxism and Literature” published in 1938, His illuminating critical essay “Marxism and English Literature_ Marxism and Literature_ Edmund Marxism and Literature: Edmund Wilson Edmund Wilson’s Marxism and Literature is the ninth essay in his Summary of Marxism and Literature by Edmund Marxism is the basic What would you do differently if you were writing a summary instead to literature essay?credit risk management in banks homework entertainment dissertation pdf . Marxism and Literature: Edmund Wilson Edmund Wilson’s Marxism and Literature is the ninth Edmund Wilson’s literary essays In “Marxism and Literature,” Edmund Wilson was among the first to Google is blocking the World Socialist Web Site from CiteSeerX - Document Details (Isaac Councill, Lee Giles, Pradeep Teregowda): Wilson’s “Marxism and Literature ” published in 1938, is his study of the origins Immediately download the Edmund Wilson summary, chapter-by-chapter analysis, book notes, essays, quotes, character descriptions, lesson plans, and more - everything 18 Feb 2011 Edmund Wilson's Marxism and Literature is the ninth essay in his collection entitled The triple Thinkers comprising twelve essays in literary This article Edmund Wilson’s literary essays In “Marxism and Literature,” Edmund Wilson was among the first to Google
Answered by
7
Edmund Wilson was deeply influenced by Marxism. In 1932, he started a work on the Russian Revolution—To the Finland station. When this work was in progress, Wilson became disillusioned with Marxism as it was preached and practised under the dictatorship of Stalin. This disillusionment is reflected in this essay.
Relationship between Art and society (Marxian principles)
è According to Marxism human society in any given country or epoch grows out of the means of production which prevailed at that place and time.
è Out of the relations between society and means of production arose a ‘super structure’.
è This ‘super structure’ is related to higher activities such as politics, law, religion, literature etc.
è These activities showed the mould of social configuration below them.
è Each was trying to get away from its roots in the social classes and constitute a professional group with its own standards of value which cut across class lines.
è Art of a great period may reach a point of vitality where it can influence the life of the period down to its very economic foundations. Thus the interaction is reciprocal.
1. Marx and Engels They never furnished socio-economic formulas to furnish the validity of art. Marx used to say that poets are originals and must be allowed to go their own way. Engels warned socialist novelists against ideologically committed literature.
2. Lenin. Lenin was an organizer and fighter. But even Lenin was fond of poetry, fiction and theatre.
Gorky said that one day he found Lenin withWar and Peace lying on the table.
“You could not find a genuine ‘muzhik’ (The Russian peasant) in literature till this count cam upon the scene”, Lenin said of Tolstoy.
3. Trotsky
Trotsky was a literary man as Lenin never was.
In 1924, he published “Literature and Revolution”.
In this work he asserted that terms like ‘proletlit’ and ‘prolet culture’ are dangerous. These terms compress the culture of the future into the narrow limits of the present.
Trotsky said, “One can’t always go by the principles of Marxism in deciding whether to accept or reject a work of art”. A work “should be judged in the first place by its own law—that is by the law of art”.
Relationship between Art and society (Marxian principles)
è According to Marxism human society in any given country or epoch grows out of the means of production which prevailed at that place and time.
è Out of the relations between society and means of production arose a ‘super structure’.
è This ‘super structure’ is related to higher activities such as politics, law, religion, literature etc.
è These activities showed the mould of social configuration below them.
è Each was trying to get away from its roots in the social classes and constitute a professional group with its own standards of value which cut across class lines.
è Art of a great period may reach a point of vitality where it can influence the life of the period down to its very economic foundations. Thus the interaction is reciprocal.
1. Marx and Engels They never furnished socio-economic formulas to furnish the validity of art. Marx used to say that poets are originals and must be allowed to go their own way. Engels warned socialist novelists against ideologically committed literature.
2. Lenin. Lenin was an organizer and fighter. But even Lenin was fond of poetry, fiction and theatre.
Gorky said that one day he found Lenin withWar and Peace lying on the table.
“You could not find a genuine ‘muzhik’ (The Russian peasant) in literature till this count cam upon the scene”, Lenin said of Tolstoy.
3. Trotsky
Trotsky was a literary man as Lenin never was.
In 1924, he published “Literature and Revolution”.
In this work he asserted that terms like ‘proletlit’ and ‘prolet culture’ are dangerous. These terms compress the culture of the future into the narrow limits of the present.
Trotsky said, “One can’t always go by the principles of Marxism in deciding whether to accept or reject a work of art”. A work “should be judged in the first place by its own law—that is by the law of art”.
Similar questions