Analyze Sidney's use of any two classical myths in the prescribed extract from Apologie for Poetrie
Answers
Censorship is one issue Sidney had to overcome through his use of rhetorical devices in the Apology.
Sidney was also versed in the phenomenon of courtiership.
As part of his strategy against the threat of censorship, Sidney uses the structure of classical oration with its conventional divisions such as exordium and peroratio.
Sidney's use of classical oration stems from his humanist education.
He uses this method to build his argument, by making use of the rhetorical methods in such guides as Thomas Wilson’s Arte of Rhetorique (1553).
Sidney also uses metaphor and allegory, to conceal and reveal his position.
For instance, his use of horsemanship as imagery and analogy substantiates his vision of the transformational power of poetry.
Sidney, as author, enters his work undetected in that the etymology of his name “Philip” is “horse-lover”.
From the opening discourse on horsemanship, Sidney expands on the horse and saddle metaphor throughout his work by the “enlarging of a conceit.
It is Sidney who then guards against a falling out with the “poet-whippers”. Sidney also attends to the rhetorical concept of memory.
Poetry, apart from its ability to delight, has an affinity with memory.
Method and style are thus key components of the Apology to overcome the problem of censorship.
For this reason, Sidney consciously defends fiction, and he attacks the privilege that is accorded to “fact.”
He argues that the poet makes no literal claims of truth, is under no illusions, and thus creates statements that are in a sense “fictional” and as true as any others (Bear 5).
What is at stake then is not only the value of poetry in the sense of its utility, but also its place in a world replete with strife, the contingent and the provisional.