Argumentative essay on education should be free for everyone
Answers
From an ethical perspective, it seems unfair that people who have less money are going to miss more opportunities. Ethically, opportunities should be open for all people. Though it may be true that the availability of an opportunity shouldn’t guarantee that a person receives that opportunity, the opportunity shouldn’t be ruled out. For example, all people should be able to become qualified to work in air traffic control, and even though a blind person is hardly guaranteed such a job position, the opportunity shouldn’t be ruled out as a default. Free education, especially free higher education, may open up a series of opportunities that some people would otherwise be unable to enjoy, and even if those opportunities are not guaranteed, they shouldn’t be ruled out by default, which is what happens when some people cannot use higher education for financial reasons. (Flood, 2014)
Some people are going to use free education as a way of getting out of work and as a way of doing nothing with their lives. Students up to the final year in High School are unable to get full-time jobs and live independently on their wages, which is why their education should be free. However, when a person is able to get a full-time job and live independently, he or she may get out of working by living on the education system. Even if the qualifications are free and not the living expenses, a person may still claim a slew of benefits and receive no incentive to ever get a job because he or she remains in the education system for years and years. (Gritz, 2010)
If all forms of education are free for students, then it becomes very easy for a person to waste his or her life on meaningless education. The decision to get into thousands upon thousands of dollars of debt in order to pursue a career should be agonizing and very difficult so as to make the student think long and hard about the decision. If all education is free, then less thought is required, and students may waste years of their life studying for qualifications that they do not need or even want. (Kamenetz, 2016)
If a student is genuinely looking for higher education and is not looking for a reason to do nothing and mess around for years by exploiting other people’s tax money through free education, then such a person may enjoy a longer education process. For example, a student taking a series of law qualifications is going to need five to seven years of education, which is also very expensive. If the cost of the qualification were removed, such a person may be able to take up jobs on an intermittent basis, stretch out his or her qualification duration, and take longer to gain said qualifications in a more comfortable manner. Instead of having to spend years as a low-income student while building debt, such a student may spend longer on a qualification and work while studying so that he or she may enjoy a more comfortable education experience. Plus, all of this would occur who the pressure of accumulating student debt. (The Leadership Institute, 2018)
Answer:
A child should get education so as to increase the knowledge that develops social awareness, better decision making skills, competency in work thus making a better citizen. Today, most of the jobs require candidates who are qualified through education.
Every society in the world has citizens of different economic sector. Those who are from poor economic background may not be able to support education for their children and so they sent them for labour to support their lives. Today, governments globally have accepted the fact that child labour is wrong and it is the right of children to get educated. To solve these issues, government should provide free education thus supporting poor families and preventing the child labour.
In my opinion, the government firms are not efficient as the private firms. The private firms usually compete each other and focus on delivering highest quality possible to sustain their business in their competitive world. For these reasons, private firms deliver much better quality in their service than a government firm who are usually protected from the competition. Therefore, when we aim for best quality education in our society it is required that education should be privatized.
The government should provide free education to support poor families and meanwhile they should allow private firms to run educational institutions. The rich families who desire for high quality education can send their children to private firms. The government firms when compete with the private firms would result in delivering high quality in delivering their service.