Question

Assume at the end of the meeting between jack, hal, and sophia, they orally agree to enter into three separate contracts. One contract is for the sale of the intellectual property of the restaurant itself for $1,000,000. The second contract is for the sale of the building that the restaurant is located in for $250,000. The third contract is for the original sign that was outside the restaurant that jack currently has in his garage, for $400. Which of these agreements violates the statute of frauds?

Answer 1

$\huge{\underline{\underline{\purple{♡Answer→}}}}$

$Two years ago, the population of a town was 10000. During first year, it increased at the rate of 5%p.A and during second year, it increased at the rate of 6%p.A. What is its present population$

• Assume at the end of the meeting between jack, hal, and sophia, they orally agree to enter into three separate contracts. One contract is for the sale of the intellectual property of the restaurant itself for 1,000,000. The second contract is for the sale of the building that the restaurant is located in for $250,000. The third contract is for the original sign that was outside the restaurant that jack currently has in his garage, for $400. Which of these agreements violates the statute of frauds.

Answer 2

Answer:

It is now current restaurant the outside go there agreements for the violates to the status of frauds...