Question

Beauty is easy to appreciate but difficult to define. As we look around, we discover beauty in pleasurable objects and sights –in the laughter of children, in the kindness of stranger. But asked to define, we run into difficulties. Dose beauty has an independent objective identity? Is it universal, or is it dependent on our sense perception? Does it lie in the eye of the beholder? We ask ourselves. A further difficulty arises when beauty manifests itself not only by its presence, but its absence as well, as when we are repulsed by ugliness and desire beauty. But then ugliness has as much a place in our lives as beauty, or may be more as when there is widespread hunger and injustice in a society. Philosophers have told us beauty is an important part of life, but isn’t ugliness a part of life too? And if art has beauty as an important ingredient, can it confine itself only to a projection of beauty? Can art ignore what is not beautiful? (a) appreciate (synonym) (b) discover (antonym) (c) laughter (synonym) (d) difficulties (antonym) (e) objective (synonym) (f) dependent (synonym) (g) lie (antonym) (h) further (synonym) (i) ugliness (synonym) (j) widespread ( synonym),(k)kindness(antonym),(L)stranger,(synonym),(m)define(synonym),(n)independent (synonym)

Answer 1

Answer:

please mark as brainlest