Can high court determine the validity of the central law??
Answers
No, the central law can only be put forward by the supreme Court.
...___....hey mate..............__
proceedings under article 226 of the constitution. the rules were framed when article 228a was not in the constitution and a question of constitutionality of a statute could be resolved by a bench of two judges. article 228a now gives a special provision for disposal of questions relating to constitutional validity of the state laws. the high court exercises jurisdiction under sub-clause (2) to determine all questions relating to the constitutional validity ..... of determining any question as to the constitutional validity of any central law or state law shall be seven. (2) a central law or a state law shall not be declared to be constitutionally invalid by the supreme court unless a majority of not less than two thirds of the judges ..... of its provisions should be retained or repealed is one to be considered by the politicians and parliament and not by the court even assuming that certain of the provisions of the forty-second amendment were not well-conceived, the task of the court ..... a minimum number of 7 judges of the supreme court as contemplated by article 144a of the constitution of india, by observing that since the particular section of the act was not applicable to the public servant, after he had ceased to be in ..... to articles 32a, 131a and 226a which were also inserted in the constitution by the forty-second amendment. these articles do not directly arise for consideration in the present case and as i do not get much assistance from them in the construction of article 228a, I do not..