Choose all the answers that apply.
The universe:
is made mostly of empty space
is expanding
contains planets and stars
is billions of years old is about 100 light years wide
Answers
contains planets and stars is billions of years old is about 100 light years wide
hey mates your answer is here
108,797 views|Feb 23, 2018,10:00 am
If The Universe Is 13.8 Billion Years Old, How Can We See 46 Billion Light Years Away?
Ethan SiegelSenior Contributor
Starts With A BangContributor Group
Science
The Universe is out there, waiting for you to discover it.
An image of the extremely distant Universe, where many of the galaxies are tens of billions of light years away.
An image of the extremely distant Universe, where many of the galaxies are tens of billions of light years away. NASA, ESA, R. WINDHORST, S. COHEN, AND M. MECHTLEY (ASU), R. O’CONNELL (UVA), P. MCCARTHY (CARNEGIE OBS), N. HATHI (UC RIVERSIDE), R. RYAN (UC DAVIS), & H. YAN (TOSU)
There are a few fundamental facts about the Universe — its origin, its history, and what it is today — that are awfully hard to wrap your head around. One of them is the Big Bang, or the idea that the Universe began a certain time ago: 13.8 billion years ago to be precise. That’s the first moment we can describe the Universe as we know it to be today: full of matter and radiation, and the ingredients that would eventually grow into stars, galaxies, planets and human beings. So how far away can we see? You might think, in a Universe limited by the speed of light, that would be 13.8 billion light years: the age of the Universe multiplied by the speed of light. But 13.8 billion light years is far too small to be the right answer. In actuality, we can see for 46 billion light years in all directions, for a total diameter of 92 billion light years.
Why is this? There are three intuitive ways we can choose to think about this problem, but only one of them is right.
Artist’s logarithmic scale conception of the observable universe.
Artist’s logarithmic scale conception of the observable universe. WIKIPEDIA USER PABLO CARLOS BUDASSI
1.) Stuff is everywhere, and light travels at the speed of light. This is the “default” mode most people have. You can imagine a Universe that’s full of stars and galaxies everywhere we look, and that these stars and galaxies began forming pretty close to the very beginning of everything. Therefore, the longer we wait, the farther we can see, as light travels in a straight line at the speed of light. So after 13.8 billion years, you’d expect to be able to see back almost 13.8 billion light years, subtracting only how long it took stars and galaxies to form after the Big Bang.
The GOODS-N field, with galaxy GN-z11 highlighted: the presently most-distant galaxy ever discovered.
The GOODS-N field, with galaxy GN-z11 highlighted: the presently most-distant galaxy ever discovered. NASA, ESA, P. OESCH (YALE UNIVERSITY), G. BRAMMER (STSCI), P. VAN DOKKUM (YALE UNIVERSITY), AND G. ILLINGWORTH (UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SANTA CRUZ)
2.) Stuff is everywhere, light moves at c, and everything can move through space. This adds another layer to the problem; not only is there a ton of stuff that emits light, but those light-emitting objects can move relative to one another. Since they can move up to (but not quite at) the speed of light, by the rules of special relativity, while the light moves towards you at the speed of light, you can imagine seeing twice as far as in the first case. Perhaps the objects now could be as far as 27.6 billion light years away, assuming their light just reaches us now and they speed away from us at almost the speed of light.
The different possible fates of the Universe, with our actual, accelerating fate shown at the right.
The different possible fates of the Universe, with our actual, accelerating fate shown at the right. NASA & ESA
3.) Stuff is everywhere, light goes at c, stars and galaxies move, and the Universe is expanding. This last layer is the counterintuitive one that most people have the hardest time with. Yes, space is full of matter, which quickly clumps into stars, galaxies and even larger structures. Yes, the light it produces all moves at c, the speed of light in a vacuum. Yes, all of this matter can move through space, mostly due to the mutual gravitational attraction of different overdense and underdense regions on one another. All of that is true, just as it was in the second scenario.
The “flows” of galaxies mapped out with the mass field nearby.
The “flows” of galaxies mapped out with the mass field nearby. HELENE M. COURTOIS, DANIEL POMAREDE, R. BRENT TULLY, YEHUDA HOFFMAN, DENIS COURTOIS, FROM “COSMOGRAPHY OF THE LOCAL UNIVERSE” (2013)
You might think it’s impossible to tell these two effects apart. If all you can measure is the wavelength of the light as it reaches your eye, how can you tell whether it’s due to motion or due to the fabric of space? As it turns out, there’s a relationship that exists between the redshift (and hence the wavelength) and the observed brightness of them
may be it's helpful for you
please mark me as brainliest ✌️✌️