Social Sciences, asked by riyabindra0036, 4 months ago

class 7th
chapter- devotional paths to the divine.

Q. What kind of religious developments were taking place in north India?
Q. Who were the main proponents of these changes? How were they promoting these changes?​

Answers

Answered by follomeplease
0

Explanation:

Ans1-During the thirteenth century, a new wave of the Bhakti movement began in north India. This was an age when Islam, Brahmanical Hinduism, Sufism, various strands of Bhakti, and the Nathpanths, Siddhas, and Yogis influenced one another. Ordinary people such as craftspersons, peasants, traders, etc.

Ans2-

ArticleMediaAdditional Info

HomeLifestyles & Social IssuesSocial Movements & Trends

Social change

sociology

WRITTEN BY

William Form See All Contributors

Full Professor Emeritus, Ohio State University.

Last Updated: Nov 16, 2020 See Article History

Social change, in sociology, the alteration of mechanisms within the social structure, characterized by changes in cultural symbols, rules of behaviour, social organizations, or value systems.

Social change

QUICK FACTS

KEY PEOPLE

Herbert Spencer

Henri Tajfel

C. Wright Mills

Frédéric Le Play

Leonard Trelawny Hobhouse

Robert Neelly Bellah

Godfrey Wilson

RELATED TOPICS

Modernization

Social movement

Cultural evolution

Revolution

J-curve hypothesis

Urbanization

Cultural imperialism

Social mobility

Advocacy network

Assimilation

Throughout the historical development of their discipline, sociologists have borrowed models of social change from other academic fields. In the late 19th century, when evolution became the predominant model for understanding biological change, ideas of social change took on an evolutionary cast, and, though other models have refined modern notions of social change, evolution persists as an underlying principle.

Other sociological models created analogies between social change and the West’s technological progress. In the mid-20th century, anthropologists borrowed from the linguistic theory of structuralism to elaborate an approach to social change called structural functionalism. This theory postulated the existence of certain basic institutions (including kinship relations and division of labour) that determine social behaviour. Because of their interrelated nature, a change in one institution will affect other institutions.

Various theoretical schools have emphasized different aspects of change. Marxist theory suggests that changes in modes of production can lead to changes in class systems, which can prompt other new forms of change or incite class conflict. A different view is conflict theory, which operates on a broad base that includes all institutions. The focus is not only on the purely divisive aspects of conflict, because conflict, while inevitable, also brings about changes that promote social integration. Taking yet another approach, structural-functional theory emphasizes the integrating forces in society that ultimately minimize instability.

Get exclusive access to content from our 1768 First Edition with your subscription.

Subscribe today

Social change can evolve from a number of different sources, including contact with other societies (diffusion), changes in the ecosystem (which can cause the loss of natural resources or widespread disease), technological change (epitomized by the Industrial Revolution, which created a new social group, the urban proletariat), and population growth and other demographic variables. Social change is also spurred by ideological, economic, and political movements.

The Changing Social Order

Social change in the broadest sense is any change in social relations. Viewed this way, social change is an ever-present phenomenon in any society. A distinction is sometimes made then between processes of change within the social structure, which serve in part to maintain the structure, and processes that modify the structure (societal change).

The specific meaning of social change depends first on the social entity considered. Changes in a small group may be important on the level of that group itself but negligible on the level of the larger society. Similarly, the observation of social change depends on the time span studied; most short-term changes are negligible when examined in the long run. Small-scale and short-term changes are characteristic of human societies, because customs and norms change, new techniques and technologies are invented, environmental changes spur new adaptations, and conflicts result in redistributions of power.

Answered by sumuakolkar77
0

Answer:

dafDikjDfhfhhfhkjkskak;Ojsdbv fffffffff

Explanation:

Similar questions
Math, 10 months ago