Coagulation process in water treatment advantages and disadvantages
Answers
Answered by
0
Coagulation and flocculation are used to remove colour, turbidity, algae and other micro-
organisms from surface waters. The addition of a chemical coagulant to the water causes the
formation of a precipitate, or floc, which entraps these impurities. Iron and aluminium can also be
removed under suitable conditions. The floc is separated from the treated water by sedimentation
and filtration, although flotation processes may be used in place of sedimentation.
The most commonly used coagulants are aluminium sulphate and ferric sulphate, although
other coagulants are available. Coagulants are dosed in solution at a rate determined by raw water
quality near the inlet of a mixing tank or flocculator. The coagulant is rapidly and thoroughly
dispersed on dosing by adding it at a point of high turbulence. The water then passes into the
sedimentation tank to allow aggregation of the flocs, which settle out to form sludge.
The advantages of coagulation are that it reduces the time required to settle out suspended
solids and is very effective in removing fine particles that are otherwise very difficult to remove.
Coagulation can also be effective in removing many protozoa, bacteria and viruses.
The principal disadvantages of using coagulants for treatment of small supplies are the cost and
the need for accurate dosing and frequent monitoring. Coagulants need accurate dosing equipment
to function efficiently and the dose required depends on raw water quality that can vary rapidly.
The efficiency of the coagulation process depends on the raw water properties, the coagulant used
and operational factors including mixing conditions, coagulant dose rate and pH value. The choice
of coagulant and determination of optimum operating conditions for a specific raw water have to
be determined by bench-scale coagulation tests (‘jar tests’).
Thus, while coagulation and flocculation are the most effective treatment for removal of colour
and turbidity they may not be suitable for small water supplies because of the level of control
required and the need to dispose of significant volumes of thin sludge.
organisms from surface waters. The addition of a chemical coagulant to the water causes the
formation of a precipitate, or floc, which entraps these impurities. Iron and aluminium can also be
removed under suitable conditions. The floc is separated from the treated water by sedimentation
and filtration, although flotation processes may be used in place of sedimentation.
The most commonly used coagulants are aluminium sulphate and ferric sulphate, although
other coagulants are available. Coagulants are dosed in solution at a rate determined by raw water
quality near the inlet of a mixing tank or flocculator. The coagulant is rapidly and thoroughly
dispersed on dosing by adding it at a point of high turbulence. The water then passes into the
sedimentation tank to allow aggregation of the flocs, which settle out to form sludge.
The advantages of coagulation are that it reduces the time required to settle out suspended
solids and is very effective in removing fine particles that are otherwise very difficult to remove.
Coagulation can also be effective in removing many protozoa, bacteria and viruses.
The principal disadvantages of using coagulants for treatment of small supplies are the cost and
the need for accurate dosing and frequent monitoring. Coagulants need accurate dosing equipment
to function efficiently and the dose required depends on raw water quality that can vary rapidly.
The efficiency of the coagulation process depends on the raw water properties, the coagulant used
and operational factors including mixing conditions, coagulant dose rate and pH value. The choice
of coagulant and determination of optimum operating conditions for a specific raw water have to
be determined by bench-scale coagulation tests (‘jar tests’).
Thus, while coagulation and flocculation are the most effective treatment for removal of colour
and turbidity they may not be suitable for small water supplies because of the level of control
required and the need to dispose of significant volumes of thin sludge.
Similar questions