Compare and contrast the constitution of India and united kingdom (at least 5 )
Answers
Answered by
3
HEYAA FOLK,
1) India is a Republic headed by President, Where as Britain is a Monarch headed by King/Queen.
2) Indian constitution is one of the biggest constitution in the world and British constitution is not big like Indian.
3) Indian constitution is a written one where as British constitution is a non written constitution.
4) Indian constitution is the only constitution after Japan, contains fundamental duties that is absent in British Constitution
5) Parliamentary form of government existed in both countries but the unlike India in Britain Parliament is the supreme body
6) Impeachment of President is possible in Indian constitution where as in Britain
impeachment of monarch is also possible at rare and rare occations.
7) Indian constitution is synthesis of flexibility and rigidity. But British Constitution is inflexible and purely rigid..
hope it helps you!!!
☺☺☺
1) India is a Republic headed by President, Where as Britain is a Monarch headed by King/Queen.
2) Indian constitution is one of the biggest constitution in the world and British constitution is not big like Indian.
3) Indian constitution is a written one where as British constitution is a non written constitution.
4) Indian constitution is the only constitution after Japan, contains fundamental duties that is absent in British Constitution
5) Parliamentary form of government existed in both countries but the unlike India in Britain Parliament is the supreme body
6) Impeachment of President is possible in Indian constitution where as in Britain
impeachment of monarch is also possible at rare and rare occations.
7) Indian constitution is synthesis of flexibility and rigidity. But British Constitution is inflexible and purely rigid..
hope it helps you!!!
☺☺☺
Similar questions