Social Sciences, asked by bhavarannya7061, 10 months ago

Compare natural law and positive law in jurisprudence

Answers

Answered by deb98
1

The distinction between natural and conventional is grounded in Greek philosophical thought which distinguish nature and Customs. Natural law, which was often associated with the divine law, encompassed past such thing as the natural movement of elements and the movement of star, and was part of nature; natural laws could not be changed by humans. Customs and conventional laws were created by humans and included such things as social customs and criminal laws and could be changed by humans.

The Greeks, and many subsequent thinkers, made the point that if conventional loss well grounded in natural law then rather than being mutable and auditory then they would be fair and just. One sign of law being natural is that hit Universal rather than Limited in one specific culture.

For example, an overwhelming number of cultures have tables against incest. Modern evolutionary Biology study that this taboos are rooted name the natural laws of genetics, because incest or inbreeding is likely to increase the frequency of deleterious recessive genes. On the other hand, most of the people things that a loss and conventions determining gender roles served as the provision against females driving in Saudi Arabia, purely conventional, as not only are they not Universal but not grounded in actual statistical evidence that female drivers are actually far safer than male drivers getting in fewer accidents and getting fewer tickets.

Similar questions