Question

Compare the warriors of those times with what you know about the
differences do you see between them? (AS)​

Answer 1

Answer:

There are many ways in which one may serve as a soldier. But there is only one way for a soldier to become a warrior - and that is to close with the enemy and to kill him. Now, that does not mean that every killer is a warrior. Killers who sit behind a console with computers and a set of remote controls dropping bombs or launching missiles from drones or aircraft - they are not warriors - they are just remote control killers. A long-range sniper is not necessarily a warrior. There is no glory derived from engaging an enemy when one is not at mutual risk from an antagonist who does not know of your presence and who cannot hit back. That is not being a warrior - but being an assassin. I’m not saying I disapprove - but I distinguish between the soldier who lays his life on the line within range of enemy weapons versus another soldier who is simply a good shooter and who can take down an opponent at 500+ yards while remaining invisible. To be a warrior is to risk death or dismemberment in close combat against the enemy - it doesn’t have to involve daggers or brass knuckles; it can be with rifles, machine guns, tanks, and howitzers - but there is high risk of mortality.

Explanation:

Please follow me

Answer 2

Answer:

(In ancient days there were the warriors less but they much enough strength to attack each other but now a days the warriors are have more but they not have much strength to attack each other)

Explanation:

If u satisfied with my answer pls mark me as BRAINLIEST ANSWER