Question

Considering the context of the 1950’s would similar arguments still have force today?  why?​

Answer 1

Answer:

hellloooo

Explanation:

ans in attachment mate

Answer 2

To comprehend the 1950s and how they relate to the arguments for or against the Rizal Law, one must first evaluate the justifications for the Rizal Law in the context of the 1950s.

• To inform your teacher that you are cheating is one element of the Rizal Law that is usually neglected in a current study.
• Theoretically, both sides had decent, honourable people on their sides, so neither would ever think to duplicate.
• Both proponents and critics of the Rizal Law unquestionably have good arguments to make in the present day, particularly when considered in the context of the 1950s.
• The 1950s saw the start of the Cold War, the post-World War II economic boom, and the American civil rights movement.
• The 1950s saw the start of the Cold War, the post-World War II economic boom, and the American civil rights movement.
• During the 1955 Senate election, the church charged Recto as being anti-Catholic and a communist.
• Once Recto was elected, the Church remained opposed to the law mandating the study of Rizal's works Noli Me Tángere and El Filibusterismo on the grounds that it would infringe upon people's rights of conscience and religion.

#SPJ3