Question

Cricket is rural roots clarify this statement

Answer 1

Cricket has rural connection in the past era and it can be clearly understood when we see the length of a test match. In the earlier days, when the Englishmen started playing cricket, there was no time limit for the test matches. The test matches continued for as many days as it took to bowl out a side twice. The village life was very slow and the cricket rules were made before the Industrial Revolution. Hence there was no restriction on the time limit. In the similar way, there was no clarity about the size of the ground in which cricket was played. This feature also proves that cricket has rural roots. Earlier cricket was played on country commons, and it used to be a unfenced land. The size of the commons usually varied from village to village, so there was no fixed length of the boundary. All these features proves that cricket has rural roots.

Answer 2

Cricket’s connection with a rural past can be seen in the length of a Test match. Originally, cricket matches had no time limit. The game went on for as long as it took to bowl out a side twice. The rhythms of village life were slower and cricket’s rules were made before the Industrial Revolution. Modern factory work meant that people were paid by the hour or the day or the week: games that were codified after the industrial revolution, like football and hockey, were strictly time-limited to fit the routines of industrial city life.
In the same way, cricket’s vagueness about the size of a cricket ground is a result of its village origins. Cricket was originally played on country commons, unfenced land that was public property. The size of the commons varied from one village to another, so there were no designated boundaries or boundary hits. If you look at the game’s equipment, you can see how cricket both changed with changing times and yet fundamentally remained true to its origins in rural England. Cricket’s most important tools are all made of natural, pre-industrial materials.