Debate about native language is better than English language
Answers
Answer:
Debate about native language is better than English language is answered below respectively.
Explanation:
Are scissors better than a shovel?
Because language may be a tool—a tool of private expression of one's cultural environment at any particular moment—there are questions that has got to be answered before your original question may be approached.
For literature, if your message is deeply imbued along with your own culture and your market is those speakers of your own language, then, no, English will never be better.
However, once your market expands to incorporate those in other cultures, it's well worth considering using English: but it still might not be best. If what you wish to convey is enlivened together with your culture, I suggest you write it in your language, and let professional translators handle all the mandatory, cultural context-switches. (This inherently human tie between culture, history and language is one reason computer-based translation beyond the best phrases is so abysmally bad.)
For those productions that don't seem to be literary, it's much more an easy matter of target market. If you would like to precise something once, and it'll cross language boundaries into other markets, consider which more localized "lingua franca" may well be most opportune, given the extent of "travel". for instance, crossing boundaries of differing, but adjacent regions of India, one might consider Hindi within the north, or Tamil or Telugu within the south. However, use of either of these is perceived there as attempts at sectarian cultural imposition. English is that the one language employed in India that lacks this aura: that avoids what may be taken as suggesting regional/cultural one-upmanship.
If your target market crosses international boundaries, English would likely be a more robust choice.
In dramatic contrast to any or all linguae francae of the past (e.g., Koine Greek [Hellenistic and Classical E. Med], Aramaic [Iron-Age Middle East], Akkadian [Bronze-Age Middle East], Latin [mediaeval Europe], Sanskrit/Prakrit [mediaeval SE Asia], Chinese [up to c. 1750, E. Asia & Vietnam], Sanskrit/Prakrit [mediaeval SE Asia], Sanskrit/Prakrit [mediaeval SE Asia], Chinese All of those other languages could not/cannot easily adapt borrowings from the populations that have used them because they were (or still are) "self-contained" and tightly constrained by extensive, limiting rules of morphology, grammar, and syntax due to nationalistic preservationism or by overly complex scripts.
English, in contrast, revels within the knowledge that there are certain things that other languages just say or do better, and accepts viable input from those other languages. English is now inherently "crowd sourced" and automatically "belongs" to those that speak it, what ever be their linguistic communication.
English may be a tool for cultural expression, but like any instrument, it has limitations and usages for which it is best suited.
Because of its vast vocabulary and easy grammar, English is wont to approximate most concepts found in other cultures. However, that approximation is cumbersome, and it'll automatically never convey the total cultural and historical context that a language will in such a situation. for instance, English features a difficult time expressing the nuances embodied within each of the c. 50 alternative ways Italian has found to specific the idea(s) within the phrase, "I love you."
The "music" of another language, with its speed, timbre, phrasing, pitch and range, and historical "echo," cannot be replaced by any other language. This magic connection of language and music is revealed within the undeniable fact that people that became aphasic due to stroke or other brain injury can often speak again—if they sing what they require to say! A culture is very tied to the way during which its medium, its language, sings its life-experiences.
English, like any other language, will best express the culture(s) in which it was developed; on the other hand, it can never replace those cultures the position of other, native languages.
Thus, your question is answered only by individuals, who must decide in each situation (1) how they need to mention what they require to mention, and (2) who is it that they need to mention it to.
Only then can one determine which tool is most opportune: you need to always tune the tool to the task.
#SPJ3
Answer:
Debate:
Explanation:
- To begin with, what is language? Humans utilise language, a spoken form of communication, to communicate with one another. Languages like English, Nepali, French, Spanish, and others are spoken all over the world. one of them. The most often used language is English. However, this does not imply that English is superior to Nepali. (My native tongue is Nepali)
- Second, learning the language of origin is simpler. In actuality, learning a native language doesn't need any work at all. On the other hand, learning a foreign language like English needs a lot of effort and it is challenging to master the English language if you are not a native speaker. We learn it automatically from the time we are little children listening to our mothers, teachers, and our environment. No matter how diligently you practise, it is difficult to acquire a native English speaker's accent and pronunciation.
- Thirdly, the value of a language relies on the environment and location of a person. For a young individual, a foreign language is preferable to his home tongue. For instance, for a citizen of India, Nepal is more helpful than English. For a Drine, Hindi and Chinese are both helpful. In his/her homeland, Hal speaks their native tongue more often than English.
- Furthermore, our culture and identity are tied to the language we speak. As we acquire a new language, we have the opportunity to embrace English culture while leaving our own behind. This has a significant impact on many countries throughout the world and cannot be ignored.
- I'd like to sum up my arguments by stating that neither English nor any other foreign language is superior to one's own tongue.
#SPJ2