Debate for or against this topic - A common man is a silent instigator under the cloak of a mute spectator'.
Answers
Explanation:
As instigator, it is your duty to provide the opening argument, or state in your R1 that you are expecting your opponent to lead this dance. However, I shall go ahead and attempt to argue against something that has not been argued for yet (which is technically a strawman).
I contend that the common man is not a silent instigator, but a verbal one and a loud one at that. Down on the quanta level, people interact day in and day out. During those interactions, there is the occasional disagreement or argument between two people. This disagreements are often not mute, but can involve shouting or even violence when shouting doesn't work [see video]. Now, many confrontations of disagreement do not escalate this far, but one thing that they have in common is that they usually involve communication of some kind. While there likely is some degree of disagreement between mimes and mutes (many mutes view mimes in the same way that blacks view whites in blackface), these are few and far enough between to understand that they are not the average man.
I'll limit at this so that my opponent has at least a little to work off of and they can now post
please mark me as a brilliant please