Debate on Social Networking Sites Should Be Banned for School Childrens.
Answers
Answered by
1
dear friend,
Social networks should be banned for children under 16 years old
Since Internet became available throughout the world, social networks have taken a special place in men's lives. Facebook reports that the amount of users reached the number of 1.11 billion in the world on May, 2013. No doubt, there are a great amount of young users under 16 years old. So I think that social networks should be banned for children under 16 years old because children might be experiencing negative influence of available information at the Internet. Some of the contents might be automatically switched off by their parents (for example, pornography). However, there is much more beyond that accessible for sharing among children. Therefore, opportunities provided by social networks for information sharing are more dangerous than real communication, because the face-to-face communication is limited in the content than social networks.
regards
Social networks should be banned for children under 16 years old
Since Internet became available throughout the world, social networks have taken a special place in men's lives. Facebook reports that the amount of users reached the number of 1.11 billion in the world on May, 2013. No doubt, there are a great amount of young users under 16 years old. So I think that social networks should be banned for children under 16 years old because children might be experiencing negative influence of available information at the Internet. Some of the contents might be automatically switched off by their parents (for example, pornography). However, there is much more beyond that accessible for sharing among children. Therefore, opportunities provided by social networks for information sharing are more dangerous than real communication, because the face-to-face communication is limited in the content than social networks.
regards
Similar questions