Democracy improve the decision making . Justifie this statement
Answers
Answered by
4
Hey friend here's your answer:- DEMOCRACY IMPROVES THE DECISION MAKING it means that democracy is based on consultation and decision. A democratic decisions always involves many persons ,decisions and meetings. When a number of people put their hands together they are able to point out possible mistakes in any decision. As the most of the decisions are taken by discussions this reduces the chances of rash or irresponsible decisions.If the decision is not according to the wishes of the people they have the right to protest and even can force the government to withdraw it.HOPE IT HELPS YOU !!
ashnoorkaur38:
wlcm
Answered by
1
Democracy is a mode of decision-making and cannot, by itself, directly improve the quality of the decision that get made. That’s like asking “How can this oven improve the quality of cake?” Like no, the oven (at least one that is functioning adequately) can only produce cake that is as good as the ingredients being placed in it,
Likewise, with democracy, in order to improve the quality of the decision, we must improve the ingredients. Luckily, there are only two in regard to democracy; voters and candidates (or whatever issue is being placed for referendum).
Improving the quality of the voters is a complex issue, because it begs the question: How ought the individual voter vote? According to his own self-interests or the interests of his community? The greater good? Posterity? These are complex questions with now clear answer. If we say that voters ought to vote for the greater good and that that is good; then promoting egalitarian values and communal spirit could, hypothetically improve the quality of democratically arrived-at decisions. More like, however, and especially in America, the electorate would rebel against such cultural impositions and retreat to their tribal identifications.
Improving the quality of candidates is another potential solution; however, again, that could largely constitute imbuing potential candidates (i.e., the general populace) with a disparate sense of values and political persuasions.
Likewise, with democracy, in order to improve the quality of the decision, we must improve the ingredients. Luckily, there are only two in regard to democracy; voters and candidates (or whatever issue is being placed for referendum).
Improving the quality of the voters is a complex issue, because it begs the question: How ought the individual voter vote? According to his own self-interests or the interests of his community? The greater good? Posterity? These are complex questions with now clear answer. If we say that voters ought to vote for the greater good and that that is good; then promoting egalitarian values and communal spirit could, hypothetically improve the quality of democratically arrived-at decisions. More like, however, and especially in America, the electorate would rebel against such cultural impositions and retreat to their tribal identifications.
Improving the quality of candidates is another potential solution; however, again, that could largely constitute imbuing potential candidates (i.e., the general populace) with a disparate sense of values and political persuasions.
Similar questions
Math,
7 months ago
Social Sciences,
7 months ago
Economy,
7 months ago
Math,
1 year ago
History,
1 year ago
Social Sciences,
1 year ago