Question

democracy seems to be good on principle but felt to be not good in practise . explain​

Answer 1

$\huge{ \boxed{ \boxed{ \blue{ \mathfrak{Democracy}}}}}$

" Democracy seems to be good on principle but felt to be not good in practise "

• Democracy is a form of government which is of the people , for the people and by the people .

Arguments for Democracy :

• A democratic government is the best form of government as it is a more accountable form of government.
• Democracy improves the quality of decision - making .
• Democracy provides a method to deal with differences and conflicts .
• It allows us to correct its own mistakes .
• Democracy enhances the dignity of citizens .

Arguments against democracy :

• Leaders keep changing in a democracy which leads to instability .
• Many people have to be consulted in a democracy , there'll be delays .
• Democracy is all about political power play .
• Democracy leads to corruption as it is based on electoral competition.
• The leaders may not know what is good for the people thereby , leading to bad decisions .

Hence , Even a coin has two sides in the same way , Democracy too is good as well as bad at times !!

Answer 2

$\huge{ \bold{ \red{ \underline{ \overline{ \mid{Answer:- }} \mid}}}}$

Statement - "Democracy seems to be good on principle but felt to be not good in practise. "

Explanation :-

Democracy is a form of government by which peoples can choose their leaders or representatives.

"Democracy seems to be good on principle but felt to be not good in practise. "

The reasons for this:

(i) The decision-making process in democracy is delayed.

(ii) Democracies often frustrate the needs of the people.

(iii) It often ignore the demands of majority of its population.

(iv) The routine tales of corruption associated with it.

(v) Most democracies fall short of elections that provide fair chance to everyone and in subjecting every decision to public debate.