Describe Nepal's journey form a monarchy to democracy
Answers
Answer:
The chapter, 'The Indian Constitution', says Nepal was a monarchy till recently and the previous constitution of Nepal, adopted in 1990, reflected that the authority rested with the King.
"A people's movement in Nepal fought for several decades to establish democracy and in 2006 they finally succeeded in putting an end to the powers of the King. Now the people have to write a new constitution to establish Nepal as a democracy," the book says.
Nepal on May 28 last dumped monarchy and embraced republican rule as its newly-elected lawmakers voted overwhelmingly to declare Nepal a secular, federal and democratic republic.
Under the terms of the interim constitution, the Constituent Assembly will have two years to draft a new constitution for Nepal.
"Nepal, by moving from a monarchy to a democratic government, needs to change its constitutive rules in order to usher in a new society. This is why, the people of Nepal are in the process of writing a new Constitution for the country," the book says.
Nepal had witnessed several popular movements for democracy. There was a 'people's struggle' in 1990 that established democracy which lasted for 12 years until 2002.
In 2002, King Gyanendra citing Maoists uprising in the countryside began taking over different aspects of the government with the army's assistance.
He finally took over as the head of the government in 2005 after which the Maoists joined other political parties to dethrone the king and restore democracy, the book said.
Hope it will help you
Mark the brainliest
Answer:
Nepal's journey form a monarchy to democracy.
Explanation:
Nepal's journey form a monarchy to democracy.
Earlier to 2006, when it led a mass campaign for democracy, Nepal was a monarchy with a king as its head of state. In this movement, the people struggled to reestablish democracy and free themselves from the rule of their king. When Nepal gained democracy in 1990, it was a third-wave nation.
Even in his democratic system, the monarch remained in charge of the country, but the representatives that the electorate chose to serve as his officials. This was the point in Nepal's transformation from an absolute monarchy, in which the king held full authority, to a constitutional monarchy, in which elected officials actually made decisions. King Birendra approved of this phase at the time, however in 2001.
He and his family were all killed. The new King Gyanendra desired control over the powers that be and was not yet ready to embrace the democratic system. In 2005, he dissolved Parliament and fired the Prime Minister. These sparked a series of uprisings by the populace, who demanded the creation of a new assembly for Nepal as well as the restoration of the parliament with full legislative authority. As a result, Girija Koirala was named Nepal's Prime Minister, which caused the monarch to quit.
#SPJ2