Question

. ‘Development for one may be the destruction for other .’Do you agree with the statement? Justify your answer.

Answer 1

It is very true that what may be development for one may be destructive for others. For example, the Multinational Companies are taking away land from poor farmers to build their industries. It is development for the company but is destruction for the poor farmers.

Answer 2

Answer:

Yes, it is true that what some may view as development for others may end up being destruction.

Explanation:

• For instance, the construction of the Sardar Sarovar dam over the Narmada river resulted in a significant displacement of the tribes living nearby, which cost the tribes their homes and land. Tribes were destroyed as a result of the construction of the Sardar sarovar dam.
• Another illustration Over 200 000 people have been uprooted multiple times in the Singrauli region at the boundary of Madhya Pradesh and Uttar Pradesh. By the Rihand dam first, followed by several National Thermal Power Corporation thermal power units.
• Singrauli has brought light to many urban dwellers' lives, but its indigenous have been left to fumble in the shadows as they attempt to recover from the trauma of displacement. Therefore, Singrauli's population was wiped off as a result of development. Farmer's land is taken by multinational corporations for the development of industries. While it may be advantageous for increasing production, it also results in the loss of arable land and the farmers' means of subsistence. Several movements have been started to protest the taking of farmers' land.

#SPJ2