Dialogue and non violence can resolve situations of conflict and injustice? Prove the statement with reference to the lesson indigo
Answers
The statement that dialogue and non violence can resolve situations of conflict an injustice is true since Gandhi had a dialogue with the farmers and tenants and he managed to resolve the settlement of a 25% refund to the farmers. Gandhi therefore broke the deadlock between the landlords and the tenants thus ending conflict and injustice.
Explanation:
The chapter aptly recognises the importance of dialogue over violence in solving situations of conflict and injustice. It can be said by the approach of Gandhi in dealing with the matter in hand, not by violent actions but through collection of detailed information from various sources and talking it out with the concerned people.
He first visited the secretary of British Landlords Association and then met the British Official Commissioner of the Tirhut division to solve the conflict at the root itself. But upon getting unfavourable responses from them, he proceeded to Motihari to get access to the peasants and their problems firsthand. When he was told to quit Champaran by the authorities, he disobeyed, for which he was summoned to the court. Even through the proceedings of the court, and then later after the judgement had been scheduled, he managed a disobedient stance against the government through dialogue with the judge as well as with the other lawyers, who he inspired to go to the jail for the poor peasants. It was, but, when Gandhi had four protracted interviews with the Lieutenant Governor, which later resulted in the appointment of an enquiry team, he proved how dialogue and peaceful civil disobedience can help conquer tough situations.
Regards