dialogue between mahatma gandhi and the farmers please help??
Answers
Explanation:
In February 1922, a violent mob set a police station on fire at Chauri Chaura with 22 policemen trapped inside. The home secretary at that time called it a “rebellion against the Raj” but for Mahatma Gandhi, it was an “index finger” that pointed the way to possible anarchy and he called off the civil disobedience movement. He even went on a fast for five days as self-punishment for the violence. He was experimenting with the means of non-violence, and, for him, means were as necessary as the end. He wrote in Young India: “They say ‘means are after all means’. I would say means are, after all, everything. There is no wall of separation between means and ends.”
As the year winds down with the protracted farmers’ protest and the deadlock looks like continuing into the new year, this is a moment for reflection and concernDemocracy needs a free and safe space for the expression of ideas but because there is no Gandhian leadership in and around us, the shadow of fear lurks. Although the government so far has shown restraint, visuals of barricades being broken, reports of cellphone towers being damaged, protests in Patna on Tuesday — all of these could erupt any time. We have already seen the tragic suicides of two farmers and any incident can take their peaceful protest into the tunnel of violence. That is why it is extremely important to break the deadlock through dialogue and minimise any chance of violence. That is why the Mahatma is an inspiration — for both sides.
i hope it will help you